Diagnosis without treatment: Responding to the War on Terror

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The War on Terror has exposed deep problems within contemporary political practice. It has demonstrated the moral fragility of liberal democracy. Much critical literature on the topic is devoted to uncovering the sources of this fragility. In this paper, we accept the general thrust of much of this literature, but turn our attention to the practical upshot of the criticism. A common feature of the literature is that, when it comes to offering remedies of the problems it identifies, what is offered is 'diagnosis without treatment'. The negation of a problem is regarded as a solution. For example, if the problem is that the USA is not acting as a good international citizen, the solution is that it begins to act as such. This is like a doctor diagnosing gout and recommending to the patient that they reduce the level of uric acid in their big toe. We argue that diagnosis without treatment is endemic in literature on the War on Terror and the ills of liberal democracy. We divide this literature into five categories and examine representative works in each. At the end of the paper, we describe what is required to avoid offering yet more diagnosis without treatment. Copyright © South African Journal of Philosophy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-33
JournalSouth African Journal of Philosophy
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

War on Terror
Liberal Democracy
Criticism
Negation
Doctors

Cite this

@article{b715393efa814f3a9845dabc23b4db00,
title = "Diagnosis without treatment: Responding to the War on Terror",
abstract = "The War on Terror has exposed deep problems within contemporary political practice. It has demonstrated the moral fragility of liberal democracy. Much critical literature on the topic is devoted to uncovering the sources of this fragility. In this paper, we accept the general thrust of much of this literature, but turn our attention to the practical upshot of the criticism. A common feature of the literature is that, when it comes to offering remedies of the problems it identifies, what is offered is 'diagnosis without treatment'. The negation of a problem is regarded as a solution. For example, if the problem is that the USA is not acting as a good international citizen, the solution is that it begins to act as such. This is like a doctor diagnosing gout and recommending to the patient that they reduce the level of uric acid in their big toe. We argue that diagnosis without treatment is endemic in literature on the War on Terror and the ills of liberal democracy. We divide this literature into five categories and examine representative works in each. At the end of the paper, we describe what is required to avoid offering yet more diagnosis without treatment. Copyright {\circledC} South African Journal of Philosophy.",
author = "D. Cox and Michael Levine",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/02580136.2014.892676",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "19--33",
journal = "South African Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "0258-0136",
publisher = "Philosophical Society of Southern Africa (PSSA)",
number = "1",

}

Diagnosis without treatment: Responding to the War on Terror. / Cox, D.; Levine, Michael.

In: South African Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2014, p. 19-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis without treatment: Responding to the War on Terror

AU - Cox, D.

AU - Levine, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The War on Terror has exposed deep problems within contemporary political practice. It has demonstrated the moral fragility of liberal democracy. Much critical literature on the topic is devoted to uncovering the sources of this fragility. In this paper, we accept the general thrust of much of this literature, but turn our attention to the practical upshot of the criticism. A common feature of the literature is that, when it comes to offering remedies of the problems it identifies, what is offered is 'diagnosis without treatment'. The negation of a problem is regarded as a solution. For example, if the problem is that the USA is not acting as a good international citizen, the solution is that it begins to act as such. This is like a doctor diagnosing gout and recommending to the patient that they reduce the level of uric acid in their big toe. We argue that diagnosis without treatment is endemic in literature on the War on Terror and the ills of liberal democracy. We divide this literature into five categories and examine representative works in each. At the end of the paper, we describe what is required to avoid offering yet more diagnosis without treatment. Copyright © South African Journal of Philosophy.

AB - The War on Terror has exposed deep problems within contemporary political practice. It has demonstrated the moral fragility of liberal democracy. Much critical literature on the topic is devoted to uncovering the sources of this fragility. In this paper, we accept the general thrust of much of this literature, but turn our attention to the practical upshot of the criticism. A common feature of the literature is that, when it comes to offering remedies of the problems it identifies, what is offered is 'diagnosis without treatment'. The negation of a problem is regarded as a solution. For example, if the problem is that the USA is not acting as a good international citizen, the solution is that it begins to act as such. This is like a doctor diagnosing gout and recommending to the patient that they reduce the level of uric acid in their big toe. We argue that diagnosis without treatment is endemic in literature on the War on Terror and the ills of liberal democracy. We divide this literature into five categories and examine representative works in each. At the end of the paper, we describe what is required to avoid offering yet more diagnosis without treatment. Copyright © South African Journal of Philosophy.

U2 - 10.1080/02580136.2014.892676

DO - 10.1080/02580136.2014.892676

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 19

EP - 33

JO - South African Journal of Philosophy

JF - South African Journal of Philosophy

SN - 0258-0136

IS - 1

ER -