Developmental screening in South Africa: Comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool

J.A.N. Van Der Linde, De Wet Swanepoel, F.P.A. Glascoe, E.M. Louw, B.M. Vinck

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2015, Makerere University, Medical School. All rights reserved. Background: Worldwide, more than 200 million children in low- and middle-income countries have developmental delays and/or disabilities. In South Africa the only nationally implemented developmental ‘screening’ tool is integrated as part of ‘The Road to Health Booklet (RTHB). Method: The study employed a comparative cross- sectional within-subject design to evaluate the accuracy of the RTHB developmental checklist against a standardized international tool i.e. the PEDS tools, consisting of the PEDS and PEDS:DM. A total of 201 participants were included through convenience sampling at primary health care facilities in Tshwane, South Africa. Results: Sensitivity of the RTHB developmental checklist is low, but specificity is high. The RTHB developmental checklist failed to identify more than half the infants at risk of delays or disorders. The nationally implemented developmental checklist is ineffective to identify at-risk infants. It should be adapted and validated or replaced in order to improve identification of at-risk infants.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)188-196
    JournalAfrican Health Sciences
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental screening in South Africa: Comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this