TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration
AU - Staniszewska, Aleksandra
AU - Game, Frances
AU - Nixon, Jane
AU - Russell, David
AU - Armstrong, David G.
AU - Ashmore, Christopher
AU - Bus, Sicco A.
AU - Chung, Jayer
AU - Chuter, Vivienne
AU - Dhatariya, Ketan
AU - Dovell, George
AU - Edmonds, Michael
AU - Fitridge, Robert
AU - Gooday, Catherine
AU - Hamilton, Emma J.
AU - Jones, Amy
AU - Kavarthapu, Venu
AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.
AU - Mills, Joseph L.
AU - Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
AU - Osborne-Grinter, Maia
AU - Peters, Edgar J.G.
AU - Shalhoub, Joseph
AU - van Netten, Jaap
AU - Wukich, Dane K.
AU - Hinchliffe, Robert J.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified. RESULTS: The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified. RESULTS: The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207599026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2337/dc24-1112
DO - 10.2337/dc24-1112
M3 - Article
C2 - 39240785
AN - SCOPUS:85207599026
SN - 0149-5992
VL - 47
SP - 1958
EP - 1968
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 11
ER -