Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Aleksandra Staniszewska, Frances Game, Jane Nixon, David Russell, David G. Armstrong, Christopher Ashmore, Sicco A. Bus, Jayer Chung, Vivienne Chuter, Ketan Dhatariya, George Dovell, Michael Edmonds, Robert Fitridge, Catherine Gooday, Emma J. Hamilton, Amy Jones, Venu Kavarthapu, Lawrence A. Lavery, Joseph L. Mills, Matilde Monteiro-SoaresMaia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J.G. Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K. Wukich, Robert J. Hinchliffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified. RESULTS: The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1958-1968
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume47
Issue number11
Early online date6 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this