TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a simple hip fracture risk prediction tool for type 2 diabetes
T2 - The fremantle diabetes study phase I
AU - Davis, Wendy A.
AU - Hamilton, Emma J.
AU - Bruce, David G.
AU - Davis, Timothy M.E.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE To develop a type 2 diabetes hip fracture risk tool in community-based patients, to validate it in an independent cohort, and to compare its performance against the only published prediction equation to include type 2 diabetes as a risk factor (QFracture). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Hip fracture hospitalizations in 1,251 participants with type 2 diabetes aged 40–89 years from the longitudinal Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (FDS1) were ascertained between entry (1993–1996) and end-2012. Competing risk regression modeling determined independent predictors of time to first fracture over 10 years and the coefficients incorporated in a risk model. The model was validated in 286 participants with type 2 diabetes from the Busselton Health Study (BHS). RESULTS Fifty FDS1 participants (4.0%) experienced a first hip fracture during 10,306 person-years of follow-up. Independent predictors of fracture were older age, female sex, lower BMI, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. The model-predicted mean 10-year incident fracture risk was 3.3% with good discrimination, calibration, and accuracy. For a 3% cutoff, sensitivity was 76.0%, specificity 71.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 10.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%. Model performance in the small BHS sample was also good (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 79.8%, PPV 6.2%, and NPV 99.2%). QFracture performed well in FDS1 but required availability of 25 variables. CONCLUSIONS The FDS1 hip fracture risk equation is a simple validated adjunct to type 2 diabetes management that uses variables that are readily available in routine care.
AB - OBJECTIVE To develop a type 2 diabetes hip fracture risk tool in community-based patients, to validate it in an independent cohort, and to compare its performance against the only published prediction equation to include type 2 diabetes as a risk factor (QFracture). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Hip fracture hospitalizations in 1,251 participants with type 2 diabetes aged 40–89 years from the longitudinal Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (FDS1) were ascertained between entry (1993–1996) and end-2012. Competing risk regression modeling determined independent predictors of time to first fracture over 10 years and the coefficients incorporated in a risk model. The model was validated in 286 participants with type 2 diabetes from the Busselton Health Study (BHS). RESULTS Fifty FDS1 participants (4.0%) experienced a first hip fracture during 10,306 person-years of follow-up. Independent predictors of fracture were older age, female sex, lower BMI, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. The model-predicted mean 10-year incident fracture risk was 3.3% with good discrimination, calibration, and accuracy. For a 3% cutoff, sensitivity was 76.0%, specificity 71.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 10.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%. Model performance in the small BHS sample was also good (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 79.8%, PPV 6.2%, and NPV 99.2%). QFracture performed well in FDS1 but required availability of 25 variables. CONCLUSIONS The FDS1 hip fracture risk equation is a simple validated adjunct to type 2 diabetes management that uses variables that are readily available in routine care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059061586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2337/dc18-1486
DO - 10.2337/dc18-1486
M3 - Article
C2 - 30455327
AN - SCOPUS:85059061586
SN - 0149-5992
VL - 42
SP - 102
EP - 109
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 1
ER -