Development and testing of a standardized method to estimate honeydew production

Melinda L. Moir, Michael Renton, Benjamin D. Hoffmann, Mei Chen Leng, Lori Lach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)


Honeydew production by Hemiptera is an ecologically important process that facilitates mutualisms and increases nutrient cycling. Accurate estimates of the amount of honeydew available in a system are essential for quantifying food web dynamics, energy flow, and the potential growth of sooty mould that inhibits plant growth. Despite the importance of honeydew, there is no standardized method to estimate its production when intensive laboratory testing is not feasible. We developed two new models to predict honeydew production, one based on insect body mass and taxonomic family, and one based on body mass and life stage. We tested the accuracy of both models' predictions for a diverse range of honeydewproducing hemipteran families (Aphididae, Pseudococcidae, Coccidae, Psyllidae, Aleyrodidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae). The method based on body mass and family provided more accurate estimates of honeydew production, due to large variation in honeydew production among families. We apply our methodology to a case study, the recalculation of honeydew available to invasive red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) in the United States. We find that the amount of honeydew may be an order of magnitude lower than that previously estimated (2.16 versus 21.6 grams of honeydew per day) and discuss possible reasons for the difference. We anticipate that being able to estimate honeydew production based on minimal biological information will have applications to agriculture, invasion biology, forestry, and carbon farming.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0201845
JournalPLoS One
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Development and testing of a standardized method to estimate honeydew production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this