Developing an Australian multi-module clinical quality registry for gynaecological cancers: a protocol paper

Natalie Heriot, Alison Brand, Paul Cohen, Sue Hegarty, Simon Hyde, Yee Leung, John R Zalcberg, Robert Rome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Gynaecological cancers collectively account for almost 10% of cancer diagnoses made in Australian women. The extent of variation in gynaecological cancer survival rates and treatment outcomes across Australia is not well documented. The purpose of the clinical quality registry described in this paper is to systematically monitor and improve quality of care provided to these women, and facilitate clinical process improvements to ensure better patient outcomes and greater adherence to best practice care. The registry infrastructure has been developed in conjunction alongside the inaugural ovarian, tubal and peritoneal (OTP) module, allowing for concurrent piloting of the methodology and one module. Additional tumour modules will be developed in time to cover the other gynaecological tumour types.Method and analysis The National Gynae-Oncology Registry (NGOR) aims to capture clinical data on all newly diagnosed cancers of the uterus, ovary, fallopian tubes, peritoneum, cervix, vulva and vagina in Australia with a view to using these data to support improved clinical care and increased adherence to ‘best practice’. Data are sourced from existing clinical databases maintained by clinicians and/or hospital gynaecological cancer units. A pilot phase incorporating only OTP cancers has recently been conducted to assess the feasibility of the registry methodology and assess the support of a quality initiative of this nature among clinicians and other key stakeholders.Ethics and dissemination The NGOR has received National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) ethics approval from Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), NMA HREC Reference Number: HREC/17/MonH/198. We also have approval from Mercy Health HREC and University of Tasmania HREC. Data will be routinely reported back to participating sites illustrating their performance against measures of agreed best practice. It is through this feedback system that the registry will support changes to quality of care and improved patient outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e034579
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Feb 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Developing an Australian multi-module clinical quality registry for gynaecological cancers: a protocol paper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this