Determinants of cost-effectiveness in tender and offset programmes for australian biodiversity conservation

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Tender and offset programmes have been broadly applied for biodiversity conservation throughout Australia. This analysis identifies the relative importance of a range of factors that determine the overall cost-effectiveness of these programmes to guide future management, based on the perceptions of survey respondents with experience in their design and implementation. The novel method of maximum entropy regression for categorical response variables is used to analyse survey results. Key actions for tender programmes, in order of decreasing importance, are the: (a) provision of adequate funding, (b) development of flexible tender designs to aid organisational efficiency, (c) promotion of landholder competition, (d) identification of low-cost means of monitoring, and (e) establishment of strong relationships with landholders. In comparison, key actions for offset programmes, in decreasing order of importance, are the: (a) establishment of efficient organisational processes, (b) promotion of a short time lag between development and the restoration of ecological values, (c) employment of contracts of extended duration, (d) investment in landholder education and support, and (e) development of appropriate biophysical models. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-32
    JournalLand Use Policy
    Volume36
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    cost effectiveness
    biodiversity
    conservation
    determinants
    ecological value
    costs
    entropy
    cost
    funding
    education
    promotion
    investment in education
    duration
    monitoring
    restoration
    regression
    efficiency
    programme
    methodology
    management

    Cite this

    @article{8af3889a78f7456da723079098173965,
    title = "Determinants of cost-effectiveness in tender and offset programmes for australian biodiversity conservation",
    abstract = "Tender and offset programmes have been broadly applied for biodiversity conservation throughout Australia. This analysis identifies the relative importance of a range of factors that determine the overall cost-effectiveness of these programmes to guide future management, based on the perceptions of survey respondents with experience in their design and implementation. The novel method of maximum entropy regression for categorical response variables is used to analyse survey results. Key actions for tender programmes, in order of decreasing importance, are the: (a) provision of adequate funding, (b) development of flexible tender designs to aid organisational efficiency, (c) promotion of landholder competition, (d) identification of low-cost means of monitoring, and (e) establishment of strong relationships with landholders. In comparison, key actions for offset programmes, in decreasing order of importance, are the: (a) establishment of efficient organisational processes, (b) promotion of a short time lag between development and the restoration of ecological values, (c) employment of contracts of extended duration, (d) investment in landholder education and support, and (e) development of appropriate biophysical models. {\circledC} 2013 Elsevier Ltd.",
    author = "Graeme Doole and Louise Blackmore and Steven Schilizzi",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.023",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "23--32",
    journal = "Land Use Policy",
    issn = "0264-8377",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Determinants of cost-effectiveness in tender and offset programmes for australian biodiversity conservation

    AU - Doole, Graeme

    AU - Blackmore, Louise

    AU - Schilizzi, Steven

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Tender and offset programmes have been broadly applied for biodiversity conservation throughout Australia. This analysis identifies the relative importance of a range of factors that determine the overall cost-effectiveness of these programmes to guide future management, based on the perceptions of survey respondents with experience in their design and implementation. The novel method of maximum entropy regression for categorical response variables is used to analyse survey results. Key actions for tender programmes, in order of decreasing importance, are the: (a) provision of adequate funding, (b) development of flexible tender designs to aid organisational efficiency, (c) promotion of landholder competition, (d) identification of low-cost means of monitoring, and (e) establishment of strong relationships with landholders. In comparison, key actions for offset programmes, in decreasing order of importance, are the: (a) establishment of efficient organisational processes, (b) promotion of a short time lag between development and the restoration of ecological values, (c) employment of contracts of extended duration, (d) investment in landholder education and support, and (e) development of appropriate biophysical models. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

    AB - Tender and offset programmes have been broadly applied for biodiversity conservation throughout Australia. This analysis identifies the relative importance of a range of factors that determine the overall cost-effectiveness of these programmes to guide future management, based on the perceptions of survey respondents with experience in their design and implementation. The novel method of maximum entropy regression for categorical response variables is used to analyse survey results. Key actions for tender programmes, in order of decreasing importance, are the: (a) provision of adequate funding, (b) development of flexible tender designs to aid organisational efficiency, (c) promotion of landholder competition, (d) identification of low-cost means of monitoring, and (e) establishment of strong relationships with landholders. In comparison, key actions for offset programmes, in decreasing order of importance, are the: (a) establishment of efficient organisational processes, (b) promotion of a short time lag between development and the restoration of ecological values, (c) employment of contracts of extended duration, (d) investment in landholder education and support, and (e) development of appropriate biophysical models. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.023

    DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.023

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 23

    EP - 32

    JO - Land Use Policy

    JF - Land Use Policy

    SN - 0264-8377

    ER -