Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Comparing Cobas 4800 EGFR Assay With Sanger Bidirectional Sequencing

Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Tindaro Giardina, Fabienne Grieu-Iacopetta, Yordanos Tesfai, Amerigo Carrello, Jeremy Taylor, Cleo Robinson, Dominic Spagnolo, Benhur Amanuel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION: Accurate detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has a crucial role in the current treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, and identification of clinically relevant mutations would qualify patients for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Historically, Sanger sequencing has been used as the reference standard assay for EGFR mutational analysis; however, Cobas 4800 is a relatively new method. In the present study, we compared the performance of the Cobas assay against that of Sanger sequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 493 consecutive formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of lung adenocarcinoma were simultaneously tested for EGFR mutations using both methods. RESULTS: After exclusion of the invalid results (n = 19), 474 samples from 455 patients were analyzed. The Cobas assay showed a mutation detection rate comparable to that of Sanger sequencing (18.1% vs. 17.9%, respectively; P < .05). Excellent agreement of 98.9% (κ, 0.964) was observed between the 2 methods. CONCLUSION: The Cobas assay is a fast and diagnostically robust platform with high analytical sensitivity; however, it is limited by its detection range and low tolerance to low DNA quality. Sanger sequencing is mostly affected by its lower analytic sensitivity. Ultimately, a dual testing strategy will be justified to increase the detection of novel mutations and reduce the false-negative results within an acceptable turnaround time.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e113–e119
    JournalClinical Lung Cancer
    Volume17
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

      Fingerprint

    Cite this