TY - JOUR
T1 - Density and shear strength of particulate rubber mixed with sand and fly ash
AU - Amuthan, M. Senthen
AU - Boominathan, A.
AU - Banerjee, Subhadeep
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - The present study examines the behavior of particulate rubber-sand mixtures (PRSM) due to the replacement of sand with fly ash. Particulate rubber (PR) of different gravimetric proportions (0, 10, 30, 50, and 100%) is mixed with sand and fly ash for the present study. Vibratory table technique, Proctor compaction technique, and minicompaction technique are adopted to determine a suitable method for finding the maximum dry unit weight of the mixtures. It is found that the Proctor compaction technique is suitable for PRSM and minicompaction technique is suitable for particulate rubber-fly ash mixtures (PRFM). Direct shear tests are carried out on the samples prepared at a relative density subjected to three different effective normal pressures. The tests results show that PRFM possesses higher shear strength, lesser compressibility, and higher shear stiffness than PRSM when PR content is more than 10% in the mixtures. Microstructure study shows that the higher strength of PRFM is attributed to the more interparticle contacts between PR and fly ash.
AB - The present study examines the behavior of particulate rubber-sand mixtures (PRSM) due to the replacement of sand with fly ash. Particulate rubber (PR) of different gravimetric proportions (0, 10, 30, 50, and 100%) is mixed with sand and fly ash for the present study. Vibratory table technique, Proctor compaction technique, and minicompaction technique are adopted to determine a suitable method for finding the maximum dry unit weight of the mixtures. It is found that the Proctor compaction technique is suitable for PRSM and minicompaction technique is suitable for particulate rubber-fly ash mixtures (PRFM). Direct shear tests are carried out on the samples prepared at a relative density subjected to three different effective normal pressures. The tests results show that PRFM possesses higher shear strength, lesser compressibility, and higher shear stiffness than PRSM when PR content is more than 10% in the mixtures. Microstructure study shows that the higher strength of PRFM is attributed to the more interparticle contacts between PR and fly ash.
KW - Fly ash
KW - Maximum dry unit weight
KW - Recycled rubber tire
KW - Sand
KW - Shear strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046248759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002322
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002322
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046248759
SN - 0899-1561
VL - 30
JO - Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
JF - Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
IS - 7
M1 - 04018136
ER -