Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures

Jordan S. Goetze, Joachim Claudet, Fraser Januchowski-Hartley, Timothy J. Langlois, Shaun K. Wilson, Crow White, Rebecca Weeks, Stacy D. Jupiter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) are one of the most common forms of fisheries management in Melanesia, demonstrating multiple objectives, including sustaining fish stocks and increasing catch efficiency to support small-scale fisheries. No studies have comprehensively assessed their ability to provide short-term fisheries benefits across the entire harvest regime. We present a novel analytical framework to guide a meta-analysis and assist future research in conceptualizing and assessing the potential of PHCs to deliver benefits for multiple fisheries-related objectives. Ten PHCs met our selection criteria and on average, they provided a 48% greater abundance and 92% greater biomass of targeted fishes compared with areas open to fishing prior to being harvested. This translated into tangible harvest benefits, with fishers removing 21% of the abundance and 49% of the biomass within PHCs, resulting in few post-harvest protection benefits. When PHCs are larger, closed for longer periods or well enforced, short-term fisheries benefits are improved. However, an increased availability of fish within PHCs leads to greater removal during harvests. Synthesis and applications. Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) can provide short-term fisheries benefits. Use of the analytical framework presented here will assist in determining long-term fisheries and conservation benefits. We recommend PHCs be closed to fishing for as long as possible, be as large as possible, that compliance be encouraged via community engagement and enforcement, and strict deadlines/goals for harvesting set to prevent overfishing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1102-1113
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

fishery
analytical framework
fishing
overfishing
biomass
meta-analysis
fish
fishery management
compliance
harvest

Cite this

Goetze, J. S., Claudet, J., Januchowski-Hartley, F., Langlois, T. J., Wilson, S. K., White, C., ... Jupiter, S. D. (2018). Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(3), 1102-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13047
Goetze, Jordan S. ; Claudet, Joachim ; Januchowski-Hartley, Fraser ; Langlois, Timothy J. ; Wilson, Shaun K. ; White, Crow ; Weeks, Rebecca ; Jupiter, Stacy D. / Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 1102-1113.
@article{77c189780b58455481dddc6aae752d14,
title = "Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures",
abstract = "Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) are one of the most common forms of fisheries management in Melanesia, demonstrating multiple objectives, including sustaining fish stocks and increasing catch efficiency to support small-scale fisheries. No studies have comprehensively assessed their ability to provide short-term fisheries benefits across the entire harvest regime. We present a novel analytical framework to guide a meta-analysis and assist future research in conceptualizing and assessing the potential of PHCs to deliver benefits for multiple fisheries-related objectives. Ten PHCs met our selection criteria and on average, they provided a 48{\%} greater abundance and 92{\%} greater biomass of targeted fishes compared with areas open to fishing prior to being harvested. This translated into tangible harvest benefits, with fishers removing 21{\%} of the abundance and 49{\%} of the biomass within PHCs, resulting in few post-harvest protection benefits. When PHCs are larger, closed for longer periods or well enforced, short-term fisheries benefits are improved. However, an increased availability of fish within PHCs leads to greater removal during harvests. Synthesis and applications. Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) can provide short-term fisheries benefits. Use of the analytical framework presented here will assist in determining long-term fisheries and conservation benefits. We recommend PHCs be closed to fishing for as long as possible, be as large as possible, that compliance be encouraged via community engagement and enforcement, and strict deadlines/goals for harvesting set to prevent overfishing.",
keywords = "analytical framework, conservation, customary management, fisheries management, locally managed marine areas, marine reserve, meta-analysis, partially protected areas, periodically harvested closures, small-scale fisheries",
author = "Goetze, {Jordan S.} and Joachim Claudet and Fraser Januchowski-Hartley and Langlois, {Timothy J.} and Wilson, {Shaun K.} and Crow White and Rebecca Weeks and Jupiter, {Stacy D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13047",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1102--1113",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology: ecology with management relevance",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Goetze, JS, Claudet, J, Januchowski-Hartley, F, Langlois, TJ, Wilson, SK, White, C, Weeks, R & Jupiter, SD 2018, 'Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1102-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13047

Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures. / Goetze, Jordan S.; Claudet, Joachim; Januchowski-Hartley, Fraser; Langlois, Timothy J.; Wilson, Shaun K.; White, Crow; Weeks, Rebecca; Jupiter, Stacy D.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 1102-1113.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demonstrating multiple benefits from periodically harvested fisheries closures

AU - Goetze, Jordan S.

AU - Claudet, Joachim

AU - Januchowski-Hartley, Fraser

AU - Langlois, Timothy J.

AU - Wilson, Shaun K.

AU - White, Crow

AU - Weeks, Rebecca

AU - Jupiter, Stacy D.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) are one of the most common forms of fisheries management in Melanesia, demonstrating multiple objectives, including sustaining fish stocks and increasing catch efficiency to support small-scale fisheries. No studies have comprehensively assessed their ability to provide short-term fisheries benefits across the entire harvest regime. We present a novel analytical framework to guide a meta-analysis and assist future research in conceptualizing and assessing the potential of PHCs to deliver benefits for multiple fisheries-related objectives. Ten PHCs met our selection criteria and on average, they provided a 48% greater abundance and 92% greater biomass of targeted fishes compared with areas open to fishing prior to being harvested. This translated into tangible harvest benefits, with fishers removing 21% of the abundance and 49% of the biomass within PHCs, resulting in few post-harvest protection benefits. When PHCs are larger, closed for longer periods or well enforced, short-term fisheries benefits are improved. However, an increased availability of fish within PHCs leads to greater removal during harvests. Synthesis and applications. Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) can provide short-term fisheries benefits. Use of the analytical framework presented here will assist in determining long-term fisheries and conservation benefits. We recommend PHCs be closed to fishing for as long as possible, be as large as possible, that compliance be encouraged via community engagement and enforcement, and strict deadlines/goals for harvesting set to prevent overfishing.

AB - Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) are one of the most common forms of fisheries management in Melanesia, demonstrating multiple objectives, including sustaining fish stocks and increasing catch efficiency to support small-scale fisheries. No studies have comprehensively assessed their ability to provide short-term fisheries benefits across the entire harvest regime. We present a novel analytical framework to guide a meta-analysis and assist future research in conceptualizing and assessing the potential of PHCs to deliver benefits for multiple fisheries-related objectives. Ten PHCs met our selection criteria and on average, they provided a 48% greater abundance and 92% greater biomass of targeted fishes compared with areas open to fishing prior to being harvested. This translated into tangible harvest benefits, with fishers removing 21% of the abundance and 49% of the biomass within PHCs, resulting in few post-harvest protection benefits. When PHCs are larger, closed for longer periods or well enforced, short-term fisheries benefits are improved. However, an increased availability of fish within PHCs leads to greater removal during harvests. Synthesis and applications. Periodically harvested closures (PHCs) can provide short-term fisheries benefits. Use of the analytical framework presented here will assist in determining long-term fisheries and conservation benefits. We recommend PHCs be closed to fishing for as long as possible, be as large as possible, that compliance be encouraged via community engagement and enforcement, and strict deadlines/goals for harvesting set to prevent overfishing.

KW - analytical framework

KW - conservation

KW - customary management

KW - fisheries management

KW - locally managed marine areas

KW - marine reserve

KW - meta-analysis

KW - partially protected areas

KW - periodically harvested closures

KW - small-scale fisheries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038229498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13047

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13047

M3 - Review article

VL - 55

SP - 1102

EP - 1113

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology: ecology with management relevance

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology: ecology with management relevance

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 3

ER -