TY - JOUR
T1 - Delineating and mapping riparian areas for ecosystem service assessment
AU - de Sosa, Laura L.
AU - Glanville, Helen C.
AU - Marshall, Miles R.
AU - Abood, Sinan A.
AU - Williams, A. Prysor
AU - Jones, Davey L.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Riparian buffers, the interface between terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, have the potential to protect water bodies from land-based pollution, and also for enhancing the delivery of a range of ecosystem services. The UK currently has no defined optimal width or maximum extent of riparian buffers for specific ecosystem services. Here, we present the first study, which attempts to (a) compare and critique different riparian buffer delineation methods and (b) investigate how ecological processes, for example, pollutant removal, nutrient cycling, and water temperature regulation, are affected spatially by proximity to the river and also within a riparian buffer zone. Our results have led to the development of new concepts for riparian delineation based on ecosystem service-specific scenarios. Results from our study suggest that choice of delineation method will influence not only the total area of potential riparian buffers but also the proportion of land cover types included, which in turn will determine their main ecosystem provision. Thus, for some ecological processes (e.g., pollutant removal), a fixed-distance approach will preserve and protect its ecosystem function, whereas for processes such as denitrification, a variable-width buffer will reflect better riparian spatial variability maximizing its ecological value. In summary, riparian delineation within UK habitats should be specific to the particular ecosystem service(s) of interest (e.g., uptake of nutrients and shading), and the effectiveness of the buffer should be ground-truthed to ensure the greatest level of protection.
AB - Riparian buffers, the interface between terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, have the potential to protect water bodies from land-based pollution, and also for enhancing the delivery of a range of ecosystem services. The UK currently has no defined optimal width or maximum extent of riparian buffers for specific ecosystem services. Here, we present the first study, which attempts to (a) compare and critique different riparian buffer delineation methods and (b) investigate how ecological processes, for example, pollutant removal, nutrient cycling, and water temperature regulation, are affected spatially by proximity to the river and also within a riparian buffer zone. Our results have led to the development of new concepts for riparian delineation based on ecosystem service-specific scenarios. Results from our study suggest that choice of delineation method will influence not only the total area of potential riparian buffers but also the proportion of land cover types included, which in turn will determine their main ecosystem provision. Thus, for some ecological processes (e.g., pollutant removal), a fixed-distance approach will preserve and protect its ecosystem function, whereas for processes such as denitrification, a variable-width buffer will reflect better riparian spatial variability maximizing its ecological value. In summary, riparian delineation within UK habitats should be specific to the particular ecosystem service(s) of interest (e.g., uptake of nutrients and shading), and the effectiveness of the buffer should be ground-truthed to ensure the greatest level of protection.
KW - ecosystem services
KW - freshwater corridors
KW - GIS
KW - land-use mapping
KW - riparian zone modelling
KW - riverbanks
KW - wetlands
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042713216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eco.1928
DO - 10.1002/eco.1928
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042713216
VL - 11
JO - Ecohydrology : ecosystems, land and water process interactions, ecohydrogeomorphology
JF - Ecohydrology : ecosystems, land and water process interactions, ecohydrogeomorphology
SN - 1936-0584
IS - 2
M1 - e1928
ER -