TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining disability in psychosis: performance of the diagnostic interview for psychosis - disability module (DIP-DIS) in the Australian National Survey of Psychotic Disorders
AU - Gureje, O.
AU - Herrman, H.
AU - Harvey, C.
AU - Trauer, T.
AU - Jablensky, Assen
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Objective: We aimed to use data from the Australian Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing to examine the psychometric properties of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis-Disability Module (DIP-DIS). The DIP-DIS is a semi-structured questionnaire specially designed to assess disability associated with psychotic disorders.Method: The psychometric properties of the instrument were determined by examining its inter-rater reliability, internal structure, as well as its criterion and discriminant validities.Results: Analysis shows: (1) that it can be rated reliably by trained interviewers, (2) that the items are complementary but tap a number of different domains, (3) that four factors account for over 66% of the variance, and (4) that it is sensitive to differing clinical populations with expected differences in level of disability. Ratings on the DIP-DIS bore significant relationships with a criterion measure of quality of life.Conclusions: The DIP-DIS has encouraging psychometric properties for cross-sectional assessment of disability and may be useful in future studies of disablement associated with psychosis. Future work should examine its sensitivity to change.
AB - Objective: We aimed to use data from the Australian Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing to examine the psychometric properties of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis-Disability Module (DIP-DIS). The DIP-DIS is a semi-structured questionnaire specially designed to assess disability associated with psychotic disorders.Method: The psychometric properties of the instrument were determined by examining its inter-rater reliability, internal structure, as well as its criterion and discriminant validities.Results: Analysis shows: (1) that it can be rated reliably by trained interviewers, (2) that the items are complementary but tap a number of different domains, (3) that four factors account for over 66% of the variance, and (4) that it is sensitive to differing clinical populations with expected differences in level of disability. Ratings on the DIP-DIS bore significant relationships with a criterion measure of quality of life.Conclusions: The DIP-DIS has encouraging psychometric properties for cross-sectional assessment of disability and may be useful in future studies of disablement associated with psychosis. Future work should examine its sensitivity to change.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0035676659
U2 - 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00959.x
DO - 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00959.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-8674
VL - 35
SP - 846
EP - 851
JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
ER -