Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77

Michael Douglas

Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77

UWA Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	433
Number of pages	434
Journal	Australian Law Journal
Volume	92
Issue number	6
Publication status	Published - 2018

Cite this

@article{0349b0f1e2f14919849f685b3ccbfd84,

title = "Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff{\textquoteright}s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77",

author = "Michael Douglas",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

volume = "92",

pages = "433",

journal = "The Australian Law Journal",

issn = "0004-9611",

publisher = "Lawbook Co.",

number = "6",

}

Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77. / Douglas, Michael.

In: Australian Law Journal, Vol. 92, No. 6, 2018, p. 433.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77

AU - Douglas, Michael

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 92

SP - 433

JO - The Australian Law Journal

JF - The Australian Law Journal

SN - 0004-9611

IS - 6

ER -