| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 433 |
| Number of pages | 434 |
| Journal | Australian Law Journal |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Cite this
@article{0349b0f1e2f14919849f685b3ccbfd84,
title = "Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77",
author = "Michael Douglas",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "433",
journal = "The Australian Law Journal",
issn = "0004-9611",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "6",
}
Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77. / Douglas, Michael.
In: Australian Law Journal, Vol. 92, No. 6, 2018, p. 433.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY - JOUR
T1 - Defamation – Contextual Truth Defence – Whether Defendants May Plead Back a Plaintiff’s Substantially True Imputations – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26: Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77
AU - Douglas, Michael
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 92
SP - 433
JO - The Australian Law Journal
JF - The Australian Law Journal
SN - 0004-9611
IS - 6
ER -