Deep-ocean seaweed dumping for carbon sequestration: Questionable, risky, and not the best use of valuable biomass

  • Thierry Chopin
  • , Barry A. Costa-Pierce
  • , Max Troell
  • , Catriona L. Hurd
  • , Mark John Costello
  • , Steven Backman
  • , Alejandro H. Buschmann
  • , Russell Cuhel
  • , Carlos M. Duarte
  • , Fredrik Gröndahl
  • , Kevin Heasman
  • , Ricardo J. Haroun
  • , Johan Johansen
  • , Alexander Jueterbock
  • , Mitchell Lench
  • , Scott Lindell
  • , Henrik Pavia
  • , Aurora M. Ricart
  • , Kristina S. Sundell
  • , Charles Yarish

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    Abstract

    Deep-ocean seaweed dumping is not an ecological, economical, or ethical answer to climate-change mitigation via carbon “sequestration.” Without sound science and sufficient knowledge on impacts to these fragile ecosystems, it distracts from more rational and effective blue-carbon interventions. We call for a moratorium on sinking seaweeds to deep-ocean ecosystems until its efficacy is established, and there is robust, evidence-based assessment of its environmental, economic, and societal sustainability.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)359-364
    Number of pages6
    JournalOne Earth
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2024

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
      SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
    2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action
    3. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
      SDG 14 Life Below Water

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deep-ocean seaweed dumping for carbon sequestration: Questionable, risky, and not the best use of valuable biomass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this