Projects per year
Abstract
Objective: To better understand automation transparency, we experimentally isolated the effects of additional information and decision recommendations on decision accuracy, decision time, perceived workload, trust, and system usability. Background: The benefits of automation transparency are well documented. Previously, however, transparency (in the form of additional information) has been coupled with the provision of decision recommendations, potentially decreasing decision-maker agency and promoting automation bias. It may instead be more beneficial to provide additional information without decision recommendations to inform operators’ unaided decision making. Methods: Participants selected the optimal uninhabited vehicle (UV) to complete missions. Additional display information and decision recommendations were provided but were not always accurate. The level of additional information (no, medium, high) was manipulated between-subjects, and the provision of recommendations (absent, present) within-subjects. Results: When decision recommendations were provided, participants made more accurate and faster decisions, and rated the UV system as more usable. However, recommendation provision reduced participants’ ability to discriminate UV system information accuracy. Increased additional information led to faster decisions, lower perceived workload, and higher trust and usability ratings but only significantly improved decision (UV selection) accuracy when recommendations were provided. Conclusion: Individuals scrutinized additional information more when not provided decision recommendations, potentially indicating a higher expected value of processing that information. However, additional information only improved performance when accompanied by recommendations to support decisions. Application: It is critical to understand the potential differential impact of, and interaction between, additional display information and decision recommendations to design effective transparent automated systems in the modern workplace.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Human Factors |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Feb 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deciphering Automation Transparency: Do the Benefits of Transparency Differ Based on Whether Decision Recommendations Are Provided?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Adapting Automation Transparency to Allow Accurate Use by Humans
Loft, S. (Investigator 01)
ARC Australian Research Council
1/01/19 → 31/01/25
Project: Research
Research output
- 1 Citations
- 1 Article
-
Transparent Automated Advice to Mitigate the Impact of Variation in Automation Reliability
Gegoff, I., Tatasciore, M., Bowden, V., McCarley, J. & Loft, S., Aug 2024, In: Human Factors: the journal of the human factors and ergonomics society. 66, 8, p. 2008-2024Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access14 Citations (Scopus)