TY - JOUR
T1 - Cut Your Losses and Let Your Profits Run
AU - Baur, Dirk G.
AU - Dimpfl, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Lee Smales, Yuanji Wen, and Antonia Rosato for fruitful discussions related to this article.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2023 With Intelligence LLC.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - This article tests the adage and investment strategy “cut your losses and let your profits run” for randomly chosen portfolios composed of large US stocks. It is found that any cut-your-losses strategy clearly underperforms the buy-and-hold strategy. The results hold for monthly, quarterly, and annual data and even for daily data around the 2008 Financial Crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. Cutting losses during the 2008 crisis performs better than the benchmark for half of all portfolios but not consistently and not during the 2020 crisis. The article demonstrates that the poor performance of the adage is due to weak loser stocks (that do not strictly fall) and strong winner stocks (that do strictly rise), which implies that the best strategy is to let both losses and profits run. The results also question the relevance of the disposition effect as we do not find any evidence that holding losers too long is bad for investors. Furthermore, it is argued that investors are lucky that “cut your losses” is not strictly implemented by all investors, as markets would frequently break down as a consequence.
AB - This article tests the adage and investment strategy “cut your losses and let your profits run” for randomly chosen portfolios composed of large US stocks. It is found that any cut-your-losses strategy clearly underperforms the buy-and-hold strategy. The results hold for monthly, quarterly, and annual data and even for daily data around the 2008 Financial Crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. Cutting losses during the 2008 crisis performs better than the benchmark for half of all portfolios but not consistently and not during the 2020 crisis. The article demonstrates that the poor performance of the adage is due to weak loser stocks (that do not strictly fall) and strong winner stocks (that do strictly rise), which implies that the best strategy is to let both losses and profits run. The results also question the relevance of the disposition effect as we do not find any evidence that holding losers too long is bad for investors. Furthermore, it is argued that investors are lucky that “cut your losses” is not strictly implemented by all investors, as markets would frequently break down as a consequence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177458448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3905/JPM.2023.1.535
DO - 10.3905/JPM.2023.1.535
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177458448
SN - 0095-4918
VL - 50
JO - Journal of Portfolio Management
JF - Journal of Portfolio Management
IS - 1
ER -