Current Trends in Neuromuscular Blockade, Management, and Monitoring amongst Singaporean Anaesthetists

W.H. Teoh, Thomas Ledowski, P.S. Tseng

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2016 Wendy H. Teoh et al.Introduction. This survey aimed to investigate the attitudes/practice pertaining the use, management, and monitoring of neuromuscular blockade amongst Singaporean anaesthetists. Methods. All specialist accredited anaesthetists registered with the Singapore Medical Council were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Results. The response rate was 39.5%. Neuromuscular monitoring (NM) was used routinely by only 13.1% despite the widespread availability of monitors. 82% stated residual NMB (RNMB) was a significant risk factor for patient outcome, but only 24% believed NMB monitoring should be compulsory in all paralyzed patients. 63.6% of anaesthetists estimated the risk of RNMB in their own institutions to be 50% said such benefits may be able to offset the associated costs. Conclusions. There is a significant need for reeducation about RNMB, studies on local RNMB incidences, and strengthening of current monitoring practices and guidelines. Strategies are discussed. As NM monitors appear widely available and reversal of NMB standard practice, it is hopeful that Singaporean anaesthetists will change and strive for evidence-based best clinical practice to enhance patient safety.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number7284146
    JournalAnesthesiology Research and Practice
    Volume2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Current Trends in Neuromuscular Blockade, Management, and Monitoring amongst Singaporean Anaesthetists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this