TY - JOUR
T1 - Cuffed endotracheal tubes in infants less than 3 kg
T2 - A retrospective cohort study
AU - Thomas, Rebecca E.
AU - Rao, Shripada C.
AU - Minutillo, Corrado
AU - Hullett, Bruce
AU - Bulsara, Max K.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Background: Cuffed endotracheal tubes are being increasingly used in infants; however, current evidence in the literature mostly includes infants ≥ 3-kg weight. Aims: The aim of this observational study was to compare the short-term outcomes with the use of Microcuff® cuffed vs uncuffed endotracheal tubes in neonates < 3 kg. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a single-centre, tertiary children's hospital neonatal intensive care unit. The study included all infants < 3 kg receiving Microcuff® cuffed endotracheal tubes over the period January 2015 to January 2016. Controls were all infants 2000-2999 g receiving an uncuffed endotracheal tube over the period September 2015 to January 2016. Results: Twenty-three patients < 3 kg were intubated with cuffed endotracheal tubes. All were inserted in the operating room. Of 23 patients, 14 (60.9%) patients had the cuff inflated in the operating room and none subsequently in the neonatal intensive care unit. The group receiving cuffed endotracheal tubes was compared with 23 patients with uncuffed endotracheal tubes. There was no difference in weight (median 2620 g vs 2590 g, diff in median = 10, 95% CI −120, 130) or duration of intubation (median 27 vs 44 hours, diff in median = 17, 95% CI −5, 46). However, there was a significant difference in gestational age (median 37 vs 35 weeks, diff in median = −1, 95% CI −2, 0) and age at intubation (median 6 vs 0 days, diff in median = −4, 95% CI −10, −1). There were no significant differences in the rates of: change of endotracheal tube to find correct size (0/23 vs 4/23, P =.109, OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01, 1.41); median ventilator leak reading (0% [IQR 0%-12%] vs 0% [IQR 0%-5.5%], P =.201, diff in median = 0, 95% CI −5.5, 0); unplanned extubations (0/23 vs 2/23; atelectasis (4/23 vs 0/23; endotracheal tube blockage (0/23 vs 0/23; pneumonia (0/23 vs 0/23; or postextubation stridor (1/23 vs 2/23). Conclusion: This retrospective study with a small sample size found that Microcuff® cuffed endotracheal tubes may be safe in neonates < 3 kg. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to address this issue definitively.
AB - Background: Cuffed endotracheal tubes are being increasingly used in infants; however, current evidence in the literature mostly includes infants ≥ 3-kg weight. Aims: The aim of this observational study was to compare the short-term outcomes with the use of Microcuff® cuffed vs uncuffed endotracheal tubes in neonates < 3 kg. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a single-centre, tertiary children's hospital neonatal intensive care unit. The study included all infants < 3 kg receiving Microcuff® cuffed endotracheal tubes over the period January 2015 to January 2016. Controls were all infants 2000-2999 g receiving an uncuffed endotracheal tube over the period September 2015 to January 2016. Results: Twenty-three patients < 3 kg were intubated with cuffed endotracheal tubes. All were inserted in the operating room. Of 23 patients, 14 (60.9%) patients had the cuff inflated in the operating room and none subsequently in the neonatal intensive care unit. The group receiving cuffed endotracheal tubes was compared with 23 patients with uncuffed endotracheal tubes. There was no difference in weight (median 2620 g vs 2590 g, diff in median = 10, 95% CI −120, 130) or duration of intubation (median 27 vs 44 hours, diff in median = 17, 95% CI −5, 46). However, there was a significant difference in gestational age (median 37 vs 35 weeks, diff in median = −1, 95% CI −2, 0) and age at intubation (median 6 vs 0 days, diff in median = −4, 95% CI −10, −1). There were no significant differences in the rates of: change of endotracheal tube to find correct size (0/23 vs 4/23, P =.109, OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01, 1.41); median ventilator leak reading (0% [IQR 0%-12%] vs 0% [IQR 0%-5.5%], P =.201, diff in median = 0, 95% CI −5.5, 0); unplanned extubations (0/23 vs 2/23; atelectasis (4/23 vs 0/23; endotracheal tube blockage (0/23 vs 0/23; pneumonia (0/23 vs 0/23; or postextubation stridor (1/23 vs 2/23). Conclusion: This retrospective study with a small sample size found that Microcuff® cuffed endotracheal tubes may be safe in neonates < 3 kg. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to address this issue definitively.
KW - airway management
KW - anesthesia
KW - devices
KW - endotracheal
KW - infant
KW - intensive care
KW - intratracheal
KW - intubation
KW - medical
KW - newborn
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041954126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pan.13311
DO - 10.1111/pan.13311
M3 - Article
C2 - 29315968
AN - SCOPUS:85041954126
SN - 1155-5645
VL - 28
SP - 204
EP - 209
JO - Paediatric Anaesthesia
JF - Paediatric Anaesthesia
IS - 3
ER -