TY - JOUR
T1 - Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and contact enrichment ratios of 5,5-dimethyl-2-(2,4,6-tris(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborinane
AU - Amarne, Hazem
AU - Helal, Wissam
AU - Taher, Deeb
AU - Korb, Marcus
AU - Al-Hunaiti, Afnan
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the University of Jordan for financial support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The title compound C14H12BF9O2 (1) was obtained as the sole product during a failed attempt to make a new organoboron compound. Characterization of the title compound by NMR (1H, 13C{1H}, 19F{1H}, and 11B) spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffractometry confirmed the formation of 1. Compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P-1, with a = 8.275(5) Å, b = 8.611(5) Å, c = 10.910(5) Å, α = 89.634(5)°, β = 89.637(5)°, γ = 87.403(5)°, V = 776.6(7) Å3, and Z = 2. The intermolecular interactions in 1 were analyzed using the Hirshfeld surface method including 2 D fingerprint plots and enrichment ratios (E), which shows that the most favorable intermolecular contacts are the Cπ···F–C and C–H···F–C interactions. The interaction energies between molecular pairs revealed the importance of these weak non-covalent interactions in stabilizing the molecular structure of 1. The title compound was also studied by DFT calculations and UV-Vis spectroscopy.
AB - The title compound C14H12BF9O2 (1) was obtained as the sole product during a failed attempt to make a new organoboron compound. Characterization of the title compound by NMR (1H, 13C{1H}, 19F{1H}, and 11B) spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffractometry confirmed the formation of 1. Compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P-1, with a = 8.275(5) Å, b = 8.611(5) Å, c = 10.910(5) Å, α = 89.634(5)°, β = 89.637(5)°, γ = 87.403(5)°, V = 776.6(7) Å3, and Z = 2. The intermolecular interactions in 1 were analyzed using the Hirshfeld surface method including 2 D fingerprint plots and enrichment ratios (E), which shows that the most favorable intermolecular contacts are the Cπ···F–C and C–H···F–C interactions. The interaction energies between molecular pairs revealed the importance of these weak non-covalent interactions in stabilizing the molecular structure of 1. The title compound was also studied by DFT calculations and UV-Vis spectroscopy.
KW - contact enrichment ratios
KW - DFT calculations
KW - Fluorinated boronate esters
KW - Hirshfeld surface analysis
KW - solid state structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126805247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15421406.2022.2050981
DO - 10.1080/15421406.2022.2050981
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126805247
SN - 1542-1406
VL - 743
SP - 77
EP - 88
JO - Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals
JF - Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals
IS - 1
ER -