Critical Water Potential for Stomatal Closure in Sitka Spruce

C. L. BEADLE, N. C. TURNER, P. G. JARVIS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Steady state rates of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance at high water potentials were measured under controlled conditions in a leaf chamber on Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] shoots detached from the forest canopy or on seedlings. The water supply to the seedlings was terminated by excision and the shoot water potential (or critical water potential) and osmotic potential at the onset of stomatal closure measured. The turgor potential was calculated. The initial osmotic potential before insertion of the shoot into the chamber was also measured. Shoot water potential and osmotic potential at stomatal closure, and initial osmotic potential were significantly higher (less negative) in foliage from the lowest level in the canopy compared with foliage in the upper canopy, and higher in shoots of seedlings transferred to low light than in those at high light. Critical water potential also varied with season, being higher in July than in October and November. In all except one instance, turgor potential at the onset of stomatal closure was negative, possibly because of dilution of the cell sap by the extracellular water during the estimate of osmotic potential. Over all the experiments variation in critical water potential was correlated with variation in critical osmotic potential and, to a lesser extent, the initial osmotic potential. However, turgor potential at the critical potential varied from +0.6 to ‐4.6 bar. This suggests that difference in turgor between the guard cells and subsidiary cells, which controls stomatal aperture, is only loosely coupled with the bulk leaf turgor and hence that bulk leaf turgor is not a good index of the turbor relations of the guard cells.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-165
Number of pages6
JournalPhysiologia Plantarum
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1978
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Picea sitchensis
osmotic pressure
water potential
turgor
Water
shoots
Seedlings
guard cells
leaves
seedlings
canopy
Picea
Light
Water Supply
Photosynthesis
forest canopy
sap
water supply
stomatal conductance
photosynthesis

Cite this

BEADLE, C. L. ; TURNER, N. C. ; JARVIS, P. G. / Critical Water Potential for Stomatal Closure in Sitka Spruce. In: Physiologia Plantarum. 1978 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 160-165.
@article{52ed5eaff18e43339572a75fb76a8dc6,
title = "Critical Water Potential for Stomatal Closure in Sitka Spruce",
abstract = "Steady state rates of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance at high water potentials were measured under controlled conditions in a leaf chamber on Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] shoots detached from the forest canopy or on seedlings. The water supply to the seedlings was terminated by excision and the shoot water potential (or critical water potential) and osmotic potential at the onset of stomatal closure measured. The turgor potential was calculated. The initial osmotic potential before insertion of the shoot into the chamber was also measured. Shoot water potential and osmotic potential at stomatal closure, and initial osmotic potential were significantly higher (less negative) in foliage from the lowest level in the canopy compared with foliage in the upper canopy, and higher in shoots of seedlings transferred to low light than in those at high light. Critical water potential also varied with season, being higher in July than in October and November. In all except one instance, turgor potential at the onset of stomatal closure was negative, possibly because of dilution of the cell sap by the extracellular water during the estimate of osmotic potential. Over all the experiments variation in critical water potential was correlated with variation in critical osmotic potential and, to a lesser extent, the initial osmotic potential. However, turgor potential at the critical potential varied from +0.6 to ‐4.6 bar. This suggests that difference in turgor between the guard cells and subsidiary cells, which controls stomatal aperture, is only loosely coupled with the bulk leaf turgor and hence that bulk leaf turgor is not a good index of the turbor relations of the guard cells.",
author = "BEADLE, {C. L.} and TURNER, {N. C.} and JARVIS, {P. G.}",
year = "1978",
doi = "10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb01585.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "160--165",
journal = "Physiologia Plantarum",
issn = "0031-9317",
publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Critical Water Potential for Stomatal Closure in Sitka Spruce. / BEADLE, C. L.; TURNER, N. C.; JARVIS, P. G.

In: Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1978, p. 160-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Water Potential for Stomatal Closure in Sitka Spruce

AU - BEADLE, C. L.

AU - TURNER, N. C.

AU - JARVIS, P. G.

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - Steady state rates of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance at high water potentials were measured under controlled conditions in a leaf chamber on Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] shoots detached from the forest canopy or on seedlings. The water supply to the seedlings was terminated by excision and the shoot water potential (or critical water potential) and osmotic potential at the onset of stomatal closure measured. The turgor potential was calculated. The initial osmotic potential before insertion of the shoot into the chamber was also measured. Shoot water potential and osmotic potential at stomatal closure, and initial osmotic potential were significantly higher (less negative) in foliage from the lowest level in the canopy compared with foliage in the upper canopy, and higher in shoots of seedlings transferred to low light than in those at high light. Critical water potential also varied with season, being higher in July than in October and November. In all except one instance, turgor potential at the onset of stomatal closure was negative, possibly because of dilution of the cell sap by the extracellular water during the estimate of osmotic potential. Over all the experiments variation in critical water potential was correlated with variation in critical osmotic potential and, to a lesser extent, the initial osmotic potential. However, turgor potential at the critical potential varied from +0.6 to ‐4.6 bar. This suggests that difference in turgor between the guard cells and subsidiary cells, which controls stomatal aperture, is only loosely coupled with the bulk leaf turgor and hence that bulk leaf turgor is not a good index of the turbor relations of the guard cells.

AB - Steady state rates of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance at high water potentials were measured under controlled conditions in a leaf chamber on Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] shoots detached from the forest canopy or on seedlings. The water supply to the seedlings was terminated by excision and the shoot water potential (or critical water potential) and osmotic potential at the onset of stomatal closure measured. The turgor potential was calculated. The initial osmotic potential before insertion of the shoot into the chamber was also measured. Shoot water potential and osmotic potential at stomatal closure, and initial osmotic potential were significantly higher (less negative) in foliage from the lowest level in the canopy compared with foliage in the upper canopy, and higher in shoots of seedlings transferred to low light than in those at high light. Critical water potential also varied with season, being higher in July than in October and November. In all except one instance, turgor potential at the onset of stomatal closure was negative, possibly because of dilution of the cell sap by the extracellular water during the estimate of osmotic potential. Over all the experiments variation in critical water potential was correlated with variation in critical osmotic potential and, to a lesser extent, the initial osmotic potential. However, turgor potential at the critical potential varied from +0.6 to ‐4.6 bar. This suggests that difference in turgor between the guard cells and subsidiary cells, which controls stomatal aperture, is only loosely coupled with the bulk leaf turgor and hence that bulk leaf turgor is not a good index of the turbor relations of the guard cells.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981608131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb01585.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb01585.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 160

EP - 165

JO - Physiologia Plantarum

JF - Physiologia Plantarum

SN - 0031-9317

IS - 2

ER -