Criteria for evidencing a disability for the purposes of a guardianship order - Home sweet home: J v Guardianship and Administration Board

Aimee Daga, Andrew Lu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Unusual or apparently poor lifestyle choices and an apparent lack of insight are insufficient evidence of a disability.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	110-112
Number of pages	3
Journal	Australian Health Law Bulletin
Volume	27
Issue number	7
Publication status	Published - Aug 2019

@article{7f051d1df1e0480b8b1f8549f3b5a9ce,

title = "Criteria for evidencing a disability for the purposes of a guardianship order - Home sweet home: J v Guardianship and Administration Board",

abstract = "Unusual or apparently poor lifestyle choices and an apparent lack of insight are insufficient evidence of a disability.",

keywords = "Guardianship, Disability",

author = "Aimee Daga and Andrew Lu",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "110--112",

journal = "Australian Health Law Bulletin",

issn = "1038-1473",

publisher = "Lexis Nexis",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for evidencing a disability for the purposes of a guardianship order - Home sweet home

T2 - J v Guardianship and Administration Board

AU - Daga, Aimee

AU - Lu, Andrew

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - Unusual or apparently poor lifestyle choices and an apparent lack of insight are insufficient evidence of a disability.

AB - Unusual or apparently poor lifestyle choices and an apparent lack of insight are insufficient evidence of a disability.

KW - Guardianship

KW - Disability

M3 - Review article

VL - 27

SP - 110

EP - 112

JO - Australian Health Law Bulletin

JF - Australian Health Law Bulletin

SN - 1038-1473

IS - 7

ER -