Counting fish: A typology for fisheries catch data

Jennifer Jacquet, Dirk Zeller, Daniel Pauly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Good decisions ideally require good data. Here, we present a straightforward typology for the broad classification of fisheries catch data. At each stage in the reporting chain, from fisher to national/international agencies, fisheries catches can be: known and reported; known and underreported; unknown and overreported; or unknown and underreported. Here, we consider largely the data reporting at the national/international level. Unfortunately, experience has shown that scientists and managers often do not know or are unconcerned with which category their data falls within a country's complete data system, or how to deal with this problem, leading to considerable implications for management. Of these four categories, the underreporting of catches seems the likeliest and most common outcome, which inevitably leads to mismanagement and misallocations of fisheries resources. Attempts to improve catch data should be undertaken, particularly via the development of catch baselines through catch reconstructions and adoption of a transparent and comprehensive country-wide expansion approach. Such an approach not only helps address shifting baselines but identifies aspects of data improvement that can be implemented in future data collection. The taxonomy presented here is a conceptual first-order analytical tool to classify data status, and hence influence management decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-144
Number of pages10
JournalJournal Of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fisheries
catch statistics
typology
Fish
Fishes
fishery
fish
International Agencies
Taxonomies
Information Systems
Managers
Research Design

Cite this

Jacquet, Jennifer ; Zeller, Dirk ; Pauly, Daniel. / Counting fish : A typology for fisheries catch data. In: Journal Of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 135-144.
@article{d3e8e7b89ae448ae9c9836db2dc09cd5,
title = "Counting fish: A typology for fisheries catch data",
abstract = "Good decisions ideally require good data. Here, we present a straightforward typology for the broad classification of fisheries catch data. At each stage in the reporting chain, from fisher to national/international agencies, fisheries catches can be: known and reported; known and underreported; unknown and overreported; or unknown and underreported. Here, we consider largely the data reporting at the national/international level. Unfortunately, experience has shown that scientists and managers often do not know or are unconcerned with which category their data falls within a country's complete data system, or how to deal with this problem, leading to considerable implications for management. Of these four categories, the underreporting of catches seems the likeliest and most common outcome, which inevitably leads to mismanagement and misallocations of fisheries resources. Attempts to improve catch data should be undertaken, particularly via the development of catch baselines through catch reconstructions and adoption of a transparent and comprehensive country-wide expansion approach. Such an approach not only helps address shifting baselines but identifies aspects of data improvement that can be implemented in future data collection. The taxonomy presented here is a conceptual first-order analytical tool to classify data status, and hence influence management decisions.",
keywords = "Catch data, Catch reconstruction, Data reporting, Fisheries management, Uncertainty",
author = "Jennifer Jacquet and Dirk Zeller and Daniel Pauly",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/19438151003716498",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "135--144",
journal = "Journal Of Integrative Environmental Sciences",
issn = "1943-815X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Counting fish : A typology for fisheries catch data. / Jacquet, Jennifer; Zeller, Dirk; Pauly, Daniel.

In: Journal Of Integrative Environmental Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 135-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Counting fish

T2 - A typology for fisheries catch data

AU - Jacquet, Jennifer

AU - Zeller, Dirk

AU - Pauly, Daniel

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Good decisions ideally require good data. Here, we present a straightforward typology for the broad classification of fisheries catch data. At each stage in the reporting chain, from fisher to national/international agencies, fisheries catches can be: known and reported; known and underreported; unknown and overreported; or unknown and underreported. Here, we consider largely the data reporting at the national/international level. Unfortunately, experience has shown that scientists and managers often do not know or are unconcerned with which category their data falls within a country's complete data system, or how to deal with this problem, leading to considerable implications for management. Of these four categories, the underreporting of catches seems the likeliest and most common outcome, which inevitably leads to mismanagement and misallocations of fisheries resources. Attempts to improve catch data should be undertaken, particularly via the development of catch baselines through catch reconstructions and adoption of a transparent and comprehensive country-wide expansion approach. Such an approach not only helps address shifting baselines but identifies aspects of data improvement that can be implemented in future data collection. The taxonomy presented here is a conceptual first-order analytical tool to classify data status, and hence influence management decisions.

AB - Good decisions ideally require good data. Here, we present a straightforward typology for the broad classification of fisheries catch data. At each stage in the reporting chain, from fisher to national/international agencies, fisheries catches can be: known and reported; known and underreported; unknown and overreported; or unknown and underreported. Here, we consider largely the data reporting at the national/international level. Unfortunately, experience has shown that scientists and managers often do not know or are unconcerned with which category their data falls within a country's complete data system, or how to deal with this problem, leading to considerable implications for management. Of these four categories, the underreporting of catches seems the likeliest and most common outcome, which inevitably leads to mismanagement and misallocations of fisheries resources. Attempts to improve catch data should be undertaken, particularly via the development of catch baselines through catch reconstructions and adoption of a transparent and comprehensive country-wide expansion approach. Such an approach not only helps address shifting baselines but identifies aspects of data improvement that can be implemented in future data collection. The taxonomy presented here is a conceptual first-order analytical tool to classify data status, and hence influence management decisions.

KW - Catch data

KW - Catch reconstruction

KW - Data reporting

KW - Fisheries management

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958274826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19438151003716498

DO - 10.1080/19438151003716498

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 135

EP - 144

JO - Journal Of Integrative Environmental Sciences

JF - Journal Of Integrative Environmental Sciences

SN - 1943-815X

IS - 2

ER -