Cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from different dairy systems in the Waikato region of New Zealand

A.A. Adler, Graeme Doole, A.J. Romera, P.C. Beukes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)


    The New Zealand dairy industry produces approximately 17% of this country's total greenhouse gas emissions (GHG-e) and it is also this nation's largest export industry. The industry needs to reduce GHG-e under proposed policy directives and for ongoing market security. Given these pressures, there is the need to identify cost-effective management strategies to reduce on-farm GHG-e. The objective of this study was to investigate how the management of dairy farms in the Waikato region of New Zealand could change to minimise the abatement costs associated with GHG-e mitigation. Three typical farm systems importing low (less than 10%), medium (10-20%), and high (more than 20%) amounts of supplement are modelled using a non-linear optimisation model.A reduction in nitrogen fertiliser application was the production factor that changed the most to achieve the cap in all of the simulated systems, followed by a reduction in stocking rate. With the prices used in this study, decreasing farming intensity by reducing nitrogen fertiliser by 21-42% and stocking rate by 8-10% represented a cost of $68-$119/ha and a production reduction of 54-117kg MS/ha for the three systems studied. Improving reproductive performance proved to be effective in reducing GHG-e, allowing for fewer replacement cows to be supported. However, it did not have a significant effect on profit when emissions were unconstrained. Nitrification inhibitors and stand-off pads were not identified as useful mitigation options, given their high cost relative to de-intensification. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)33-43
    JournalJournal of Environmental Management
    Publication statusPublished - 2013


    Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from different dairy systems in the Waikato region of New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this