TY - JOUR
T1 - Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users
T2 - An objective method to improve speech perception
AU - Távora-Vieira, Dayse
AU - Ffoulkes, Ellen
AU - Voola, Marcus
AU - Marino, Roberta
AU - Wedekind, Andre
N1 - Funding Information:
DT awarded the research fellowship grant from Rayne Medical Research Foundation. https://www.rainefoundation.org.au/research/fundingopportunities/clinician-research-fellowships/ The funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, preparation of the manuscript or decision to publish. AW, EF, MV and RM received no specific funding for this work. To the audiologists C Broadbent, K Eager, S Mitchell and K van der Merwe for their contribution on this study. P Connolly for editing a version of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Távora-Vieira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/10/7
Y1 - 2022/10/7
N2 - Objective To investigate if cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) measures can be used to verify the cochlear implant (CI) map and consequently improve CI outcomes in adults with bilateral hearing loss. Design CAEPs were measured in CI recipients using the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/ and /s/. If CAEP responses were present for all speech tokens, the participant’s map was considered “satisfactory”. If CAEP responses were absent, the CI map was considered “unsatisfactory” and therefore adjusted and CAEP measures repeated. This was repeated until auditory potentials were seen in response to all four speech tokens. Speech testing was conducted pre-CI, as well as before and after CAEP-guided map adjustments. Results 108 adult unilateral CI users participated, whose sound processors were previously programmed using subjective methods. 42 CI users elicited a CAEP response to all four speech tokens and therefore no further mapping adjustments were made. 66 subjected lacked a CAEP response to at least one speech token and had their CI map adjusted accordingly. Of those, 31 showed a CAEP response to all four speech tokens, and the average speech score significantly improved after CI map adjustments based on CAEP responses. Conclusion CAEP’s are an objective tool that can be used to guide and verify CI mapping in adults CI users. Significant improvement in speech scores was observed in participants who had their CI map adjusted based on CAEP responses.
AB - Objective To investigate if cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) measures can be used to verify the cochlear implant (CI) map and consequently improve CI outcomes in adults with bilateral hearing loss. Design CAEPs were measured in CI recipients using the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/ and /s/. If CAEP responses were present for all speech tokens, the participant’s map was considered “satisfactory”. If CAEP responses were absent, the CI map was considered “unsatisfactory” and therefore adjusted and CAEP measures repeated. This was repeated until auditory potentials were seen in response to all four speech tokens. Speech testing was conducted pre-CI, as well as before and after CAEP-guided map adjustments. Results 108 adult unilateral CI users participated, whose sound processors were previously programmed using subjective methods. 42 CI users elicited a CAEP response to all four speech tokens and therefore no further mapping adjustments were made. 66 subjected lacked a CAEP response to at least one speech token and had their CI map adjusted accordingly. Of those, 31 showed a CAEP response to all four speech tokens, and the average speech score significantly improved after CI map adjustments based on CAEP responses. Conclusion CAEP’s are an objective tool that can be used to guide and verify CI mapping in adults CI users. Significant improvement in speech scores was observed in participants who had their CI map adjusted based on CAEP responses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139571928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0274643
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0274643
M3 - Article
C2 - 36206248
AN - SCOPUS:85139571928
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 10
M1 - e0274643
ER -