Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception

Dayse Távora-Vieira, Ellen Ffoulkes, Marcus Voola, Roberta Marino, Andre Wedekind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To investigate if cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) measures can be used to verify the cochlear implant (CI) map and consequently improve CI outcomes in adults with bilateral hearing loss. Design CAEPs were measured in CI recipients using the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/ and /s/. If CAEP responses were present for all speech tokens, the participant’s map was considered “satisfactory”. If CAEP responses were absent, the CI map was considered “unsatisfactory” and therefore adjusted and CAEP measures repeated. This was repeated until auditory potentials were seen in response to all four speech tokens. Speech testing was conducted pre-CI, as well as before and after CAEP-guided map adjustments. Results 108 adult unilateral CI users participated, whose sound processors were previously programmed using subjective methods. 42 CI users elicited a CAEP response to all four speech tokens and therefore no further mapping adjustments were made. 66 subjected lacked a CAEP response to at least one speech token and had their CI map adjusted accordingly. Of those, 31 showed a CAEP response to all four speech tokens, and the average speech score significantly improved after CI map adjustments based on CAEP responses. Conclusion CAEP’s are an objective tool that can be used to guide and verify CI mapping in adults CI users. Significant improvement in speech scores was observed in participants who had their CI map adjusted based on CAEP responses.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0274643
Number of pages14
JournalPLoS One
Volume17
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this