Corrigendum to ‘Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury: A systematic literature review & meta-analysis’ [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009)

Paul M. Gittings; Tiffany L. Grisbrook; Dale W. Edgar; Fiona M. Wood; Benedict M. Wand; Neil E. O'Connell

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012

Corrigendum to ‘Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury: A systematic literature review & meta-analysis’ [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009)

Paul M. Gittings, Tiffany L. Grisbrook, Dale W. Edgar, Fiona M. Wood, Benedict M. Wand, Neil E. O'Connell

Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

The authors regret that the text on page 13 contained errors. It should read: “Post-hoc sensitivity analysis was undertaken with SDs imputed for the studies by Refs. [7,21]. The imputed SD was the median of all other SD values in the analysis. The effect of RT on muscle strength for the whole group was significant in favour of RT (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.08–0.66, p = 0.01) and heterogeneity was assessed as non-significant (I² = 33%, p = 0.14). For children, the effect was statistically significant (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01–0.54, p = 0.04), yet not significant in adults (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI 0.17–1.96, p = 0.10) (Fig. 4)” Please find the corrected version of Fig. 4 below: [Figure presented] The corrections highlighted in this corrigendum do not affect the overall interpretation of the outcome. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1240-1241
Number of pages	2
Journal	Burns
Volume	46
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012
Publication status	Published - Aug 2020

Access to Document

10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012

Cite this

Gittings, P. M., Grisbrook, T. L., Edgar, D. W., Wood, F. M., Wand, B. M., & O'Connell, N. E. (2020). Corrigendum to ‘Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury: A systematic literature review & meta-analysis’ [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009). Burns, 46(5), 1240-1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012

@article{7a9e600c1cdb4c6a8f2edfab0d330481,

title = "Corrigendum to {\textquoteleft}Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury: A systematic literature review & meta-analysis{\textquoteright} [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009)",

abstract = "The authors regret that the text on page 13 contained errors. It should read: “Post-hoc sensitivity analysis was undertaken with SDs imputed for the studies by Refs. [7,21]. The imputed SD was the median of all other SD values in the analysis. The effect of RT on muscle strength for the whole group was significant in favour of RT (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.08–0.66, p = 0.01) and heterogeneity was assessed as non-significant (I2 = 33%, p = 0.14). For children, the effect was statistically significant (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01–0.54, p = 0.04), yet not significant in adults (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI 0.17–1.96, p = 0.10) (Fig. 4)” Please find the corrected version of Fig. 4 below: [Figure presented] The corrections highlighted in this corrigendum do not affect the overall interpretation of the outcome. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",

author = "Gittings, {Paul M.} and Grisbrook, {Tiffany L.} and Edgar, {Dale W.} and Wood, {Fiona M.} and Wand, {Benedict M.} and O'Connell, {Neil E.}",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "1240--1241",

journal = "Burns",

issn = "0305-4179",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "5",

}

Corrigendum to ‘Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury: A systematic literature review & meta-analysis’ [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009). / Gittings, Paul M.; Grisbrook, Tiffany L.; Edgar, Dale W. et al.
In: Burns, Vol. 46, No. 5, 08.2020, p. 1240-1241.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to ‘Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury

T2 - A systematic literature review & meta-analysis’ [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009)

AU - Gittings, Paul M.

AU - Grisbrook, Tiffany L.

AU - Edgar, Dale W.

AU - Wood, Fiona M.

AU - Wand, Benedict M.

AU - O'Connell, Neil E.

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

N2 - The authors regret that the text on page 13 contained errors. It should read: “Post-hoc sensitivity analysis was undertaken with SDs imputed for the studies by Refs. [7,21]. The imputed SD was the median of all other SD values in the analysis. The effect of RT on muscle strength for the whole group was significant in favour of RT (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.08–0.66, p = 0.01) and heterogeneity was assessed as non-significant (I2 = 33%, p = 0.14). For children, the effect was statistically significant (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01–0.54, p = 0.04), yet not significant in adults (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI 0.17–1.96, p = 0.10) (Fig. 4)” Please find the corrected version of Fig. 4 below: [Figure presented] The corrections highlighted in this corrigendum do not affect the overall interpretation of the outcome. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - The authors regret that the text on page 13 contained errors. It should read: “Post-hoc sensitivity analysis was undertaken with SDs imputed for the studies by Refs. [7,21]. The imputed SD was the median of all other SD values in the analysis. The effect of RT on muscle strength for the whole group was significant in favour of RT (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.08–0.66, p = 0.01) and heterogeneity was assessed as non-significant (I2 = 33%, p = 0.14). For children, the effect was statistically significant (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01–0.54, p = 0.04), yet not significant in adults (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI 0.17–1.96, p = 0.10) (Fig. 4)” Please find the corrected version of Fig. 4 below: [Figure presented] The corrections highlighted in this corrigendum do not affect the overall interpretation of the outcome. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083706556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.012

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 32340772

AN - SCOPUS:85083706556

SN - 0305-4179

VL - 46

SP - 1240

EP - 1241

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

IS - 5

ER -

Corrigendum to ‘Resistance training for rehabilitation after burn injury: A systematic literature review & meta-analysis’ [Burns 44 (2018) 731–751](S0305417917304527)(10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.009)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this