Abstract
The authors would like to correct errors to the paper that were introduced during the publishing process. Table 1 was published incorrectly, with some numbers missing. Detailed captions were also omitted for the two Figures, Figure 1 and Figure 2. Please find the corrected version of Table 1 and the complete Figure captions included in this Corrigendum: Figure captions: Fig. 1: Variation in total sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in total sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 6.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 6.5 h/8-h at work-unadjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) for random effects linear mixed model. Adjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) for linear mixed model adjusted for age, gender, marital status, BMI. Data were collected in Victoria, Australia in 2012–13. Fig. 2: Variation in prolonged sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in prolonged sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 3.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 3.7 h/8-h at work – adjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) for random effects linear mixed model. Adjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) for linear mixed model adjusted for age, gender, marital status, BMI. Data were collected in Victoria, Australia in 2012–13.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 301-302 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Preventive Medicine Reports |
| Volume | 8 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2017 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Corrigendum to “Office workers' objectively assessed total and prolonged sitting time : Individual-level correlates and worksite variations” (Prev. Med. Rep. (2016) 4 (184–191) (S2211335516300614)(10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.011)). / Hadgraft, Nyssa T.; Healy, Genevieve N.; Owen, Neville; Winkler, Elisabeth A.H.; Lynch, Brigid M.; Sethi, Parneet; Eakin, Elizabeth G.; Moodie, Marj; LaMontagne, Anthony D.; Wiesner, Glen; Willenberg, Lisa; Dunstan, David W.
In: Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol. 8, 01.12.2017, p. 301-302.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Office workers' objectively assessed total and prolonged sitting time
T2 - Individual-level correlates and worksite variations” (Prev. Med. Rep. (2016) 4 (184–191) (S2211335516300614)(10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.011))
AU - Hadgraft, Nyssa T.
AU - Healy, Genevieve N.
AU - Owen, Neville
AU - Winkler, Elisabeth A.H.
AU - Lynch, Brigid M.
AU - Sethi, Parneet
AU - Eakin, Elizabeth G.
AU - Moodie, Marj
AU - LaMontagne, Anthony D.
AU - Wiesner, Glen
AU - Willenberg, Lisa
AU - Dunstan, David W.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - The authors would like to correct errors to the paper that were introduced during the publishing process. Table 1 was published incorrectly, with some numbers missing. Detailed captions were also omitted for the two Figures, Figure 1 and Figure 2. Please find the corrected version of Table 1 and the complete Figure captions included in this Corrigendum: Figure captions: Fig. 1: Variation in total sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in total sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 6.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 6.5 h/8-h at work-unadjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) for random effects linear mixed model. Adjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) for linear mixed model adjusted for age, gender, marital status, BMI. Data were collected in Victoria, Australia in 2012–13. Fig. 2: Variation in prolonged sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in prolonged sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 3.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 3.7 h/8-h at work – adjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) for random effects linear mixed model. Adjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) for linear mixed model adjusted for age, gender, marital status, BMI. Data were collected in Victoria, Australia in 2012–13.
AB - The authors would like to correct errors to the paper that were introduced during the publishing process. Table 1 was published incorrectly, with some numbers missing. Detailed captions were also omitted for the two Figures, Figure 1 and Figure 2. Please find the corrected version of Table 1 and the complete Figure captions included in this Corrigendum: Figure captions: Fig. 1: Variation in total sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in total sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 6.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 6.5 h/8-h at work-unadjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) for random effects linear mixed model. Adjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) for linear mixed model adjusted for age, gender, marital status, BMI. Data were collected in Victoria, Australia in 2012–13. Fig. 2: Variation in prolonged sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in prolonged sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 3.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 3.7 h/8-h at work – adjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) for random effects linear mixed model. Adjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) for linear mixed model adjusted for age, gender, marital status, BMI. Data were collected in Victoria, Australia in 2012–13.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029715771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.07.001
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 8
SP - 301
EP - 302
JO - Preventive Medicine Reports
JF - Preventive Medicine Reports
SN - 2211-3355
ER -