Abstract
The authors regret to inform that there are a few typological errors in the above-cited paper. The corrections are given below. In Table 5, we reported CO2 fluxes measured by Silva et al. (2012) of −1540 to 3024 mmol m−2 d−1. The correct values are −114.5–225.0 mmol m−2 d−1. This led us to write in section 4.4: 'When compared with other systems (Table 5), maximum CO2 fluxes measured from WA WSPs were 14 times higher than from subtropical WSPs (Hernandez-Paniagua et al., 2014), but 10 times lower than from tropical WSPs (Silva et al., 2012)'. However, using the correct values, CO2 fluxes measured in our study become in the same range as those reported by Silva et al. In Table 5, we report CH4 fluxes measured by Silva et al. (2012) of −8.7–106 mmol m−2 d−1. The correct values are −4.9–59.8 mmol m−2 d−1. The authors regretfully apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 853 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Water Research |
| Volume | 123 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 15 Oct 2017 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Corrigendum to “Greenhouse gas emissions from waste stabilisation ponds in Western Australia and Quebec (Canada)” [Water Res. 101 (2015) 64–74]. / Glaz, Patricia; Bartosiewicz, Maciej; Laurion, Isabelle; Reichwaldt, Elke S.; Maranger, Roxane; Ghadouani, Anas.
In: Water Research, Vol. 123, 15.10.2017, p. 853.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Greenhouse gas emissions from waste stabilisation ponds in Western Australia and Quebec (Canada)” [Water Res. 101 (2015) 64–74]
AU - Glaz, Patricia
AU - Bartosiewicz, Maciej
AU - Laurion, Isabelle
AU - Reichwaldt, Elke S.
AU - Maranger, Roxane
AU - Ghadouani, Anas
PY - 2017/10/15
Y1 - 2017/10/15
N2 - The authors regret to inform that there are a few typological errors in the above-cited paper. The corrections are given below. In Table 5, we reported CO2 fluxes measured by Silva et al. (2012) of −1540 to 3024 mmol m−2 d−1. The correct values are −114.5–225.0 mmol m−2 d−1. This led us to write in section 4.4: 'When compared with other systems (Table 5), maximum CO2 fluxes measured from WA WSPs were 14 times higher than from subtropical WSPs (Hernandez-Paniagua et al., 2014), but 10 times lower than from tropical WSPs (Silva et al., 2012)'. However, using the correct values, CO2 fluxes measured in our study become in the same range as those reported by Silva et al. In Table 5, we report CH4 fluxes measured by Silva et al. (2012) of −8.7–106 mmol m−2 d−1. The correct values are −4.9–59.8 mmol m−2 d−1. The authors regretfully apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret to inform that there are a few typological errors in the above-cited paper. The corrections are given below. In Table 5, we reported CO2 fluxes measured by Silva et al. (2012) of −1540 to 3024 mmol m−2 d−1. The correct values are −114.5–225.0 mmol m−2 d−1. This led us to write in section 4.4: 'When compared with other systems (Table 5), maximum CO2 fluxes measured from WA WSPs were 14 times higher than from subtropical WSPs (Hernandez-Paniagua et al., 2014), but 10 times lower than from tropical WSPs (Silva et al., 2012)'. However, using the correct values, CO2 fluxes measured in our study become in the same range as those reported by Silva et al. In Table 5, we report CH4 fluxes measured by Silva et al. (2012) of −8.7–106 mmol m−2 d−1. The correct values are −4.9–59.8 mmol m−2 d−1. The authors regretfully apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027516930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.024
DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.024
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 123
SP - 853
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
SN - 0043-1354
ER -