TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to ‘Global trends in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion in marine fisheries from 1950 to 2016’[Marine Policy, 107 (2019), 103382] (Marine Policy (2019) 107, (S0308597X1730893X), (10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.001))
AU - Greer, Krista
AU - Zeller, Dirk
AU - Woroniak, Jessika
AU - Coulter, Angie
AU - Winchester, Maeve
AU - Palomares, M. L.Deng
AU - Pauly, Daniel
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - The authors would like to correct the footnote in Table 1. In Section 2.1. Fishing effort data of the main text of Greer et al. (2019), which described the estimation of mean length of fishing vessels by vessel length class, we stated correctly that “… the arithmetic mean of length was used only for the two smallest length classes, whereas the geometric mean was used for the larger (and broader) length classes.” However, footnote “a” of Table 1 in Greer et al. (2019) incorrectly stated the opposite. We present here the corrected Table 1 with the rectified text for footnote “a”. References. Greer K, Zeller D, Woroniak J, Coulter A, Palomares MLD and Pauly D (2019) Global trends in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion in marine fisheries from 1950 to 2016. Marine Policy 107: 103382. Table 1 Capacity of motorised and non-motorised fishing vessels by length class. [Table presented] a The geometric mean was used for length class 3 and up, while the arithmetic mean was used for length class 1 and 2. b If no country-specific information was found, all motorised fleets less than length class 2 were assumed to be small-scale. All motorised fleets in length class 3 and greater were assumed to be industrial. c All non-motorised vessels were assumed to belong to the small-scale sector. d There were no fleets found to have non-motorised vessels greater than length class 3.
AB - The authors would like to correct the footnote in Table 1. In Section 2.1. Fishing effort data of the main text of Greer et al. (2019), which described the estimation of mean length of fishing vessels by vessel length class, we stated correctly that “… the arithmetic mean of length was used only for the two smallest length classes, whereas the geometric mean was used for the larger (and broader) length classes.” However, footnote “a” of Table 1 in Greer et al. (2019) incorrectly stated the opposite. We present here the corrected Table 1 with the rectified text for footnote “a”. References. Greer K, Zeller D, Woroniak J, Coulter A, Palomares MLD and Pauly D (2019) Global trends in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion in marine fisheries from 1950 to 2016. Marine Policy 107: 103382. Table 1 Capacity of motorised and non-motorised fishing vessels by length class. [Table presented] a The geometric mean was used for length class 3 and up, while the arithmetic mean was used for length class 1 and 2. b If no country-specific information was found, all motorised fleets less than length class 2 were assumed to be small-scale. All motorised fleets in length class 3 and greater were assumed to be industrial. c All non-motorised vessels were assumed to belong to the small-scale sector. d There were no fleets found to have non-motorised vessels greater than length class 3.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091886581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104188
DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104188
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85091886581
SN - 0308-597X
VL - 121
JO - Marine Policy
JF - Marine Policy
M1 - 104188
ER -