Conventional Glycaemic Control May Not Be Beneficial in Diabetic Patients Following Cardiac Surgery

Nicholas GR. Bayfield, Liam Bibo, Charley Budgeon, Robert Larbalestier, Tom Briffa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Stress hyperglycaemia is common following cardiac surgery. Its optimal management is uncertain and emerging literature suggests that flexible glycaemic control in diabetic patients may be preferable. This study aims to assess the relationship between maximal postoperative in-hospital blood glucose levels (BSL) and the morbidity and mortality outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic cardiac surgery patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a tertiary single centre institution from 2015 to 2019 was undertaken. Early management and outcomes of hyperglycaemia following cardiac surgery were assessed via multivariable regression modelling. Follow-up was assessed to 1 year postoperatively. Results: Consecutive non-diabetic patients (n=1,050) and diabetic patients (n=689) post cardiac surgery were included. Diabetics with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L did not have an increased risk of morbidity or mortality compared to non-diabetics with peak BSL ≤10.0 mmol/L. In non-diabetics, stress hyperglycaemia with peak BSL >10.0 mmol/L was associated with overall wound complications (5.7% vs 8.8%, OR 1.64 [1.00–2.69], p=0.049) and postoperative pneumonia (2.7% vs 7.3%, OR 2.35 [1.26–4.38], p=0.007). Diabetic patients with postoperative peak BSL >13.9 mmol/L were at an increased risk of overall wound complication (7.4% vs 14.8%, OR 2.47 [1.46–4.16], p
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1692-1698
Number of pages7
JournalHeart, Lung and Circulation
Volume31
Issue number12
Early online dateSept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional Glycaemic Control May Not Be Beneficial in Diabetic Patients Following Cardiac Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this