Controversy and consensus regarding vitamin D: Recent methodological changes and the risks and benefits of vitamin D supplementation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	13-28
Number of pages	16
Journal	Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
Volume	53
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3109/10408363.2015.1074157
Publication status	Published - 2 Jan 2016

Access to Document

@article{3d893b192eec4a778f020af2b7f61274,

title = "Controversy and consensus regarding vitamin D: Recent methodological changes and the risks and benefits of vitamin D supplementation",

author = "Paul Glendenning and Charles Inderjeeth",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "2",

doi = "10.3109/10408363.2015.1074157",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "13--28",

journal = "Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences",

issn = "1040-8363",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversy and consensus regarding vitamin D: Recent methodological changes and the risks and benefits of vitamin D supplementation

AU - Glendenning, Paul

AU - Inderjeeth, Charles

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

U2 - 10.3109/10408363.2015.1074157

DO - 10.3109/10408363.2015.1074157

M3 - Article

C2 - 26377861

SN - 1040-8363

VL - 53

SP - 13

EP - 28

JO - Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

JF - Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

IS - 1

ER -