Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship

Tracey Bretag, Rowena Harper, Michael Burton, Cath Ellis, Philip Newton, Karen van Haeringen, Sonia Saddiqui, Pearl Rozenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different assessment types would prompt considerations of contract cheating in students. Perceptions of likelihood were highest among students who speak a language other than English at home. Perceptions of likelihood were also higher among students who reported there to be lots of opportunities to cheat, and amongst students who were dissatisfied with the teaching and learning environment. Perceptions of likelihood for certain assessment types were also higher in commerce and engineering than in any other discipline. Overall, four assessment types were perceived by students to be the least likely to be outsourced, however these are also the least likely to be set by educators. The analysis indicates that educators are more likely to use these assessment tasks when they report positively on organisational support for teaching and learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-691
Number of pages16
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

student
educator
Teaching
commerce
multivariate analysis
learning environment
research project
engineering
university
language
learning

Cite this

Bretag, Tracey ; Harper, Rowena ; Burton, Michael ; Ellis, Cath ; Newton, Philip ; van Haeringen, Karen ; Saddiqui, Sonia ; Rozenberg, Pearl. / Contract cheating and assessment design : exploring the relationship. In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019 ; Vol. 44, No. 5. pp. 676-691.
@article{309c595991ba4fa2a36da8691bc6a791,
title = "Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship",
abstract = "This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different assessment types would prompt considerations of contract cheating in students. Perceptions of likelihood were highest among students who speak a language other than English at home. Perceptions of likelihood were also higher among students who reported there to be lots of opportunities to cheat, and amongst students who were dissatisfied with the teaching and learning environment. Perceptions of likelihood for certain assessment types were also higher in commerce and engineering than in any other discipline. Overall, four assessment types were perceived by students to be the least likely to be outsourced, however these are also the least likely to be set by educators. The analysis indicates that educators are more likely to use these assessment tasks when they report positively on organisational support for teaching and learning.",
keywords = "academic integrity, Assessment design, contract cheating, higher education, teaching and learning",
author = "Tracey Bretag and Rowena Harper and Michael Burton and Cath Ellis and Philip Newton and {van Haeringen}, Karen and Sonia Saddiqui and Pearl Rozenberg",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2018.1527892",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "676--691",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Bretag, T, Harper, R, Burton, M, Ellis, C, Newton, P, van Haeringen, K, Saddiqui, S & Rozenberg, P 2019, 'Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship' Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 676-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1527892

Contract cheating and assessment design : exploring the relationship. / Bretag, Tracey; Harper, Rowena; Burton, Michael; Ellis, Cath; Newton, Philip; van Haeringen, Karen; Saddiqui, Sonia; Rozenberg, Pearl.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 44, No. 5, 04.07.2019, p. 676-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contract cheating and assessment design

T2 - exploring the relationship

AU - Bretag, Tracey

AU - Harper, Rowena

AU - Burton, Michael

AU - Ellis, Cath

AU - Newton, Philip

AU - van Haeringen, Karen

AU - Saddiqui, Sonia

AU - Rozenberg, Pearl

PY - 2019/7/4

Y1 - 2019/7/4

N2 - This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different assessment types would prompt considerations of contract cheating in students. Perceptions of likelihood were highest among students who speak a language other than English at home. Perceptions of likelihood were also higher among students who reported there to be lots of opportunities to cheat, and amongst students who were dissatisfied with the teaching and learning environment. Perceptions of likelihood for certain assessment types were also higher in commerce and engineering than in any other discipline. Overall, four assessment types were perceived by students to be the least likely to be outsourced, however these are also the least likely to be set by educators. The analysis indicates that educators are more likely to use these assessment tasks when they report positively on organisational support for teaching and learning.

AB - This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different assessment types would prompt considerations of contract cheating in students. Perceptions of likelihood were highest among students who speak a language other than English at home. Perceptions of likelihood were also higher among students who reported there to be lots of opportunities to cheat, and amongst students who were dissatisfied with the teaching and learning environment. Perceptions of likelihood for certain assessment types were also higher in commerce and engineering than in any other discipline. Overall, four assessment types were perceived by students to be the least likely to be outsourced, however these are also the least likely to be set by educators. The analysis indicates that educators are more likely to use these assessment tasks when they report positively on organisational support for teaching and learning.

KW - academic integrity

KW - Assessment design

KW - contract cheating

KW - higher education

KW - teaching and learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058700976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2018.1527892

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2018.1527892

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 676

EP - 691

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 5

ER -