Contemporary art and patents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article investigates whether contemporary art can or should be protected by patent law. The investigation commences with a working definition of contemporary art and then examines the way that patent law has treated fine art in the US, UK and Australia, and whether this treatment would extend to contemporary art. A number of examples of patents granted to types of contemporary art are reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-261
Number of pages18
JournalQueen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Cite this

@article{d8caa2ed9d0544559f81ccaf5fd8584d,
title = "Contemporary art and patents",
abstract = "This article investigates whether contemporary art can or should be protected by patent law. The investigation commences with a working definition of contemporary art and then examines the way that patent law has treated fine art in the US, UK and Australia, and whether this treatment would extend to contemporary art. A number of examples of patents granted to types of contemporary art are reviewed.",
keywords = "aesthetic creations, art, patents",
author = "Michael Blakeney",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.4337/qmjip.2019.03.01",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "244--261",
journal = "Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property",
issn = "2045-9807",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Contemporary art and patents. / Blakeney, Michael.

In: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 9, No. 3, 07.2019, p. 244-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary art and patents

AU - Blakeney, Michael

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - This article investigates whether contemporary art can or should be protected by patent law. The investigation commences with a working definition of contemporary art and then examines the way that patent law has treated fine art in the US, UK and Australia, and whether this treatment would extend to contemporary art. A number of examples of patents granted to types of contemporary art are reviewed.

AB - This article investigates whether contemporary art can or should be protected by patent law. The investigation commences with a working definition of contemporary art and then examines the way that patent law has treated fine art in the US, UK and Australia, and whether this treatment would extend to contemporary art. A number of examples of patents granted to types of contemporary art are reviewed.

KW - aesthetic creations

KW - art

KW - patents

U2 - 10.4337/qmjip.2019.03.01

DO - 10.4337/qmjip.2019.03.01

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 244

EP - 261

JO - Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

JF - Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

SN - 2045-9807

IS - 3

ER -