TY - JOUR
T1 - Constructed wetlands for landfill leachate treatment
T2 - A review
AU - Bakhshoodeh, Reza
AU - Alavi, Nadali
AU - Oldham, Carolyn
AU - Santos, Rafael M.
AU - Babaei, Ali Akbar
AU - Vymazal, Jan
AU - Paydary, Pooya
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Constructed wetlands (CWs) are engineered systems that are constructed to mimic natural wetlands. These systems simulate the processes that happen in natural wetlands and remove pollutants from wastewater. CWs have been previously used to treat a wide range of waste streams, including landfill leachate, and they have shown relatively good removal efficiencies. Although the literature on using CWs to treat different waste streams has been previously reviewed, there has been no literature review of constructed wetlands for leachate treatment. This critical analysis of available literature on landfill leachate treatment by CWs will help optimize future research in the field. The primary objective of this article is to present a comprehensive overview of the diverse range of practices, applications and research into the use of CW systems for removing contaminants from landfill leachate. This review of 85 papers across 20 countries focusses on the treatment performance of three different types of CWs (free water surface flow; subsurface flow (horizontal and vertical); and hybrid systems), using data from field- and pilot-scale studies, and discusses the impact of design criteria on CW treatment performance. The reported average % removal efficiencies of BOD5, COD, TP, PO4, Ammonia-N, TKN, TN, and TSS, for Horizontal/Vertical/Hybrid/Free water surface CWs were, respectively: 60.1/79.7/72.2/80.6%; 54.5/59.2/56.2/45.4%; 63.5/46.2/-6.4/5.5%; 67.7/62.1/5.2/-1.6%; 67.2/66.7/68.9/70.0%; 45.4/64.2/64.9/10.6%; 72.1/88.2/67.3/81.7%; and 69.3/55.5/51.8/59.5%.
AB - Constructed wetlands (CWs) are engineered systems that are constructed to mimic natural wetlands. These systems simulate the processes that happen in natural wetlands and remove pollutants from wastewater. CWs have been previously used to treat a wide range of waste streams, including landfill leachate, and they have shown relatively good removal efficiencies. Although the literature on using CWs to treat different waste streams has been previously reviewed, there has been no literature review of constructed wetlands for leachate treatment. This critical analysis of available literature on landfill leachate treatment by CWs will help optimize future research in the field. The primary objective of this article is to present a comprehensive overview of the diverse range of practices, applications and research into the use of CW systems for removing contaminants from landfill leachate. This review of 85 papers across 20 countries focusses on the treatment performance of three different types of CWs (free water surface flow; subsurface flow (horizontal and vertical); and hybrid systems), using data from field- and pilot-scale studies, and discusses the impact of design criteria on CW treatment performance. The reported average % removal efficiencies of BOD5, COD, TP, PO4, Ammonia-N, TKN, TN, and TSS, for Horizontal/Vertical/Hybrid/Free water surface CWs were, respectively: 60.1/79.7/72.2/80.6%; 54.5/59.2/56.2/45.4%; 63.5/46.2/-6.4/5.5%; 67.7/62.1/5.2/-1.6%; 67.2/66.7/68.9/70.0%; 45.4/64.2/64.9/10.6%; 72.1/88.2/67.3/81.7%; and 69.3/55.5/51.8/59.5%.
KW - Australia
KW - Western Australia
KW - Nutrient treatment
KW - Heavy metals mobility
KW - Organics biodegradation
KW - HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW
KW - WASTE-WATER TREATMENT
KW - PHRAGMITES-AUSTRALIS
KW - PILOT-SCALE
KW - NITROGEN REMOVAL
KW - HEAVY-METALS
KW - PHOSPHORUS RETENTION
KW - ORGANICS REMOVAL
KW - MINE DRAINAGE
KW - WASTEWATERS
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105725
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105725
M3 - Review article
VL - 146
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
SN - 0925-8574
M1 - 105725
ER -