TY - JOUR
T1 - Constitutive cytomorphologic features of medullary thyroid carcinoma using different staining methods
AU - Liu, Chih Yi
AU - Chen, Chien Chin
AU - Bychkov, Andrey
AU - Agarwal, Shipra
AU - Zhu, Yun
AU - Hang, Jen Fan
AU - Lai, Chiung Ru
AU - Na, Hee Young
AU - Park, So Yeon
AU - Li, Weiwei
AU - Liu, Zhiyan
AU - Jain, Deepali
AU - Suzuki, Ayana
AU - Hirokawa, Mitsuyoshi
AU - Chia, Noel
AU - Nga, Min En
AU - Jitpasutham, Tikamporn
AU - Keelawat, Somboon
AU - Satoh, Shinya
AU - Gunawardena, Dilini
AU - Kumarasinghe, Priyanthi
AU - Jung, Chan Kwon
AU - Kakudo, Kennichi
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - (1) Background: Accurate preoperative identification of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is challenging due to a spectrum of cytomorphologic features. However, there is a scarcity of studies describing the cytomorphologic features as seen on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears prepared using different staining methods. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective study on MTC cases with available FNA slides from 13 hospitals distributed across 8 Asia-Pacific countries. The differences in the constitutive cytomorphologic features of MTC with each cytopreparatory method were recorded. A comparative analysis of cytologic characteristics was carried out with appropriate statistical tests. (3) Results: Of a total of 167 MTC samples retrospectively recruited, 148 (88.6%) were interpreted as MTC/suspicious for MTC (S-MTC). The staining methods used were Papanicolaou, hematoxylin-eosin, and Romanowsky stains. Seven out of the eleven cytologic criteria can be readily recognized by all three cytopreparatory methods: high cellularity, cellular pleomorphism, plasmacytoid cells, round cells, dyshesive cells, salt-and-pepper chromatin, and binucleation or multinucleation. An accurate diagnosis was achieved in 125 (84.5%) of the 148 samples whose FNAs exhibited five or more atypical features. Conclusions: The present work is the first study on MTC to compare the morphological differences among the cytologic staining techniques. We investigated the constitutive features and the reliability of diagnostic parameters. A feasible scoring system based upon cytomorphologic data alone is proposed to achieve a high degree of diagnostic accuracy.
AB - (1) Background: Accurate preoperative identification of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is challenging due to a spectrum of cytomorphologic features. However, there is a scarcity of studies describing the cytomorphologic features as seen on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears prepared using different staining methods. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective study on MTC cases with available FNA slides from 13 hospitals distributed across 8 Asia-Pacific countries. The differences in the constitutive cytomorphologic features of MTC with each cytopreparatory method were recorded. A comparative analysis of cytologic characteristics was carried out with appropriate statistical tests. (3) Results: Of a total of 167 MTC samples retrospectively recruited, 148 (88.6%) were interpreted as MTC/suspicious for MTC (S-MTC). The staining methods used were Papanicolaou, hematoxylin-eosin, and Romanowsky stains. Seven out of the eleven cytologic criteria can be readily recognized by all three cytopreparatory methods: high cellularity, cellular pleomorphism, plasmacytoid cells, round cells, dyshesive cells, salt-and-pepper chromatin, and binucleation or multinucleation. An accurate diagnosis was achieved in 125 (84.5%) of the 148 samples whose FNAs exhibited five or more atypical features. Conclusions: The present work is the first study on MTC to compare the morphological differences among the cytologic staining techniques. We investigated the constitutive features and the reliability of diagnostic parameters. A feasible scoring system based upon cytomorphologic data alone is proposed to achieve a high degree of diagnostic accuracy.
KW - Cytology
KW - Fine-needle aspiration
KW - Medullary thyroid carcinoma
KW - Sensitivity
KW - Specificity
KW - Thyroid
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85112667723
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics11081396
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics11081396
M3 - Article
C2 - 34441330
AN - SCOPUS:85112667723
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 11
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 8
M1 - 1396
ER -