Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests

Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan, Sonia Graham, Zhao Ma, Jacob N. Barney, Shaun R. Coutts, Ana L. Caicedo, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Natalie M. West, Lior Blank, Alexander L. Metcalf, Myrtille Lacoste, Carlo R. Moreno, Jeffrey A. Evans, Ian Burke, Hugh Beckie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Weeds pose severe threats to agricultural and natural landscapes worldwide. One major reason for the failure to effectively manage weeds at landscape scales is that current Best Management Practice guidelines, and research on how to improve such guidelines, focus too narrowly on property-level management decisions. Insufficiently considered are the aggregate effects of individual actions to determine landscape-scale outcomes, or whether there are collective practices that would improve weed management outcomes. Here, we frame landscape-scale weed management as a social dilemma, where trade-offs occur between individual and collective interests. We apply a transdisciplinary system approach—integrating the perspectives of ecologists, evolutionary biologists and agronomists into a social science theory of social dilemmas—to four landscape-scale weed management challenges: (i) achieving plant biosecurity, (ii) preventing weed seed contamination, (iii) maintaining herbicide susceptibility and (iv) sustainably using biological control. We describe how these four challenges exhibit characteristics of ‘public good problems’, wherein effective weed management requires the active contributions of multiple actors, while benefits are not restricted to these contributors. Adequate solutions to address these public good challenges often involve a subset of the eight design principles developed by Elinor Ostrom for ‘common pool social dilemmas’, together with design principles that reflect the public good nature of the problems. This paper is a call to action for scholars and practitioners to broaden our conceptualization and approaches to weed management problems. Such progress begins by evaluating the public good characteristics of specific weed management challenges and applying context-specific design principles to realize successful and sustainable weed management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-351
Number of pages9
JournalNature Plants
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

weed control
weeds
agronomists
social sciences
best management practices
biosecurity
ecologists
biologists
biological control
herbicides
seeds

Cite this

Bagavathiannan, M. V., Graham, S., Ma, Z., Barney, J. N., Coutts, S. R., Caicedo, A. L., ... Beckie, H. (2019). Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests. Nature Plants, 5(4), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0395-y
Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar V. ; Graham, Sonia ; Ma, Zhao ; Barney, Jacob N. ; Coutts, Shaun R. ; Caicedo, Ana L. ; De Clerck-Floate, Rosemarie ; West, Natalie M. ; Blank, Lior ; Metcalf, Alexander L. ; Lacoste, Myrtille ; Moreno, Carlo R. ; Evans, Jeffrey A. ; Burke, Ian ; Beckie, Hugh. / Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests. In: Nature Plants. 2019 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 343-351.
@article{49848696d4c34955ad8039e50f317f8b,
title = "Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests",
abstract = "Weeds pose severe threats to agricultural and natural landscapes worldwide. One major reason for the failure to effectively manage weeds at landscape scales is that current Best Management Practice guidelines, and research on how to improve such guidelines, focus too narrowly on property-level management decisions. Insufficiently considered are the aggregate effects of individual actions to determine landscape-scale outcomes, or whether there are collective practices that would improve weed management outcomes. Here, we frame landscape-scale weed management as a social dilemma, where trade-offs occur between individual and collective interests. We apply a transdisciplinary system approach—integrating the perspectives of ecologists, evolutionary biologists and agronomists into a social science theory of social dilemmas—to four landscape-scale weed management challenges: (i) achieving plant biosecurity, (ii) preventing weed seed contamination, (iii) maintaining herbicide susceptibility and (iv) sustainably using biological control. We describe how these four challenges exhibit characteristics of ‘public good problems’, wherein effective weed management requires the active contributions of multiple actors, while benefits are not restricted to these contributors. Adequate solutions to address these public good challenges often involve a subset of the eight design principles developed by Elinor Ostrom for ‘common pool social dilemmas’, together with design principles that reflect the public good nature of the problems. This paper is a call to action for scholars and practitioners to broaden our conceptualization and approaches to weed management problems. Such progress begins by evaluating the public good characteristics of specific weed management challenges and applying context-specific design principles to realize successful and sustainable weed management.",
author = "Bagavathiannan, {Muthukumar V.} and Sonia Graham and Zhao Ma and Barney, {Jacob N.} and Coutts, {Shaun R.} and Caicedo, {Ana L.} and {De Clerck-Floate}, Rosemarie and West, {Natalie M.} and Lior Blank and Metcalf, {Alexander L.} and Myrtille Lacoste and Moreno, {Carlo R.} and Evans, {Jeffrey A.} and Ian Burke and Hugh Beckie",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41477-019-0395-y",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "343--351",
journal = "Nature Plants",
issn = "2055-026X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

Bagavathiannan, MV, Graham, S, Ma, Z, Barney, JN, Coutts, SR, Caicedo, AL, De Clerck-Floate, R, West, NM, Blank, L, Metcalf, AL, Lacoste, M, Moreno, CR, Evans, JA, Burke, I & Beckie, H 2019, 'Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests' Nature Plants, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0395-y

Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests. / Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar V.; Graham, Sonia; Ma, Zhao; Barney, Jacob N.; Coutts, Shaun R.; Caicedo, Ana L.; De Clerck-Floate, Rosemarie; West, Natalie M.; Blank, Lior; Metcalf, Alexander L.; Lacoste, Myrtille; Moreno, Carlo R.; Evans, Jeffrey A.; Burke, Ian; Beckie, Hugh.

In: Nature Plants, Vol. 5, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 343-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests

AU - Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar V.

AU - Graham, Sonia

AU - Ma, Zhao

AU - Barney, Jacob N.

AU - Coutts, Shaun R.

AU - Caicedo, Ana L.

AU - De Clerck-Floate, Rosemarie

AU - West, Natalie M.

AU - Blank, Lior

AU - Metcalf, Alexander L.

AU - Lacoste, Myrtille

AU - Moreno, Carlo R.

AU - Evans, Jeffrey A.

AU - Burke, Ian

AU - Beckie, Hugh

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Weeds pose severe threats to agricultural and natural landscapes worldwide. One major reason for the failure to effectively manage weeds at landscape scales is that current Best Management Practice guidelines, and research on how to improve such guidelines, focus too narrowly on property-level management decisions. Insufficiently considered are the aggregate effects of individual actions to determine landscape-scale outcomes, or whether there are collective practices that would improve weed management outcomes. Here, we frame landscape-scale weed management as a social dilemma, where trade-offs occur between individual and collective interests. We apply a transdisciplinary system approach—integrating the perspectives of ecologists, evolutionary biologists and agronomists into a social science theory of social dilemmas—to four landscape-scale weed management challenges: (i) achieving plant biosecurity, (ii) preventing weed seed contamination, (iii) maintaining herbicide susceptibility and (iv) sustainably using biological control. We describe how these four challenges exhibit characteristics of ‘public good problems’, wherein effective weed management requires the active contributions of multiple actors, while benefits are not restricted to these contributors. Adequate solutions to address these public good challenges often involve a subset of the eight design principles developed by Elinor Ostrom for ‘common pool social dilemmas’, together with design principles that reflect the public good nature of the problems. This paper is a call to action for scholars and practitioners to broaden our conceptualization and approaches to weed management problems. Such progress begins by evaluating the public good characteristics of specific weed management challenges and applying context-specific design principles to realize successful and sustainable weed management.

AB - Weeds pose severe threats to agricultural and natural landscapes worldwide. One major reason for the failure to effectively manage weeds at landscape scales is that current Best Management Practice guidelines, and research on how to improve such guidelines, focus too narrowly on property-level management decisions. Insufficiently considered are the aggregate effects of individual actions to determine landscape-scale outcomes, or whether there are collective practices that would improve weed management outcomes. Here, we frame landscape-scale weed management as a social dilemma, where trade-offs occur between individual and collective interests. We apply a transdisciplinary system approach—integrating the perspectives of ecologists, evolutionary biologists and agronomists into a social science theory of social dilemmas—to four landscape-scale weed management challenges: (i) achieving plant biosecurity, (ii) preventing weed seed contamination, (iii) maintaining herbicide susceptibility and (iv) sustainably using biological control. We describe how these four challenges exhibit characteristics of ‘public good problems’, wherein effective weed management requires the active contributions of multiple actors, while benefits are not restricted to these contributors. Adequate solutions to address these public good challenges often involve a subset of the eight design principles developed by Elinor Ostrom for ‘common pool social dilemmas’, together with design principles that reflect the public good nature of the problems. This paper is a call to action for scholars and practitioners to broaden our conceptualization and approaches to weed management problems. Such progress begins by evaluating the public good characteristics of specific weed management challenges and applying context-specific design principles to realize successful and sustainable weed management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064074486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41477-019-0395-y

DO - 10.1038/s41477-019-0395-y

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 343

EP - 351

JO - Nature Plants

JF - Nature Plants

SN - 2055-026X

IS - 4

ER -

Bagavathiannan MV, Graham S, Ma Z, Barney JN, Coutts SR, Caicedo AL et al. Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests. Nature Plants. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):343-351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0395-y