Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services

Amy O'Brien, Julie McCormack, Kimberley J. Hoiles, Hunna J. Watson, Rebecca A. Anderson, Phillipa Hay, Sarah J. Egan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: There are few evidence-based guidelines for inpatient pediatric eating disorders. The aim was to gain perspectives from those providing and receiving inpatient pediatric eating disorder care on the essential components treatment. Method: A modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-based opinions. Participants (N = 74) were recruited for three panels: clinicians (n = 24), carers (n = 31), and patients (n = 19), who endorsed three rounds of statements online. Results: A total of 167 statements were rated, 79 were accepted and reached a consensus level of at least 75% across all panels, and 87 were rejected. All agreed that families should be involved in treatment, and thatpsychological therapy be offered in specialist inpatient units. Areas of disagreement included that patients expressed a desire for autonomy in sessions being available without carers, and that weight gain should be gradual and admissions longer, in contrast to carers and clinicians. Carers endorsed that legal frameworks should be used to retain patients if required, and that inpatients are supervised at all times, in contrast to patients and clinicians. Clinicians endorsed that food access should be restricted outside meal times, in contrast to patients and carers. Discussion: The findings indicate areas of consensus in admission criteria, and that families should be involved in treatment, family involvement in treatment, while there was disagreement across groups on topics including weight goals and nutrition management. Perspectives from patients, carers, and clinicians may be useful to consider during future revisions of best practice guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-410
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Inpatients
Consensus
Pediatrics
Practice Guidelines
Delphi Technique
Therapeutics
Weight Gain
Meals
Feeding and Eating Disorders
Guidelines
Weights and Measures
Food

Cite this

O'Brien, A., McCormack, J., Hoiles, K. J., Watson, H. J., Anderson, R. A., Hay, P., & Egan, S. J. (2018). Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51(5), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22857
O'Brien, Amy ; McCormack, Julie ; Hoiles, Kimberley J. ; Watson, Hunna J. ; Anderson, Rebecca A. ; Hay, Phillipa ; Egan, Sarah J. / Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services. In: International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2018 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 401-410.
@article{d4abf961d3454d91b1f493f465fe3af4,
title = "Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services",
abstract = "Objective: There are few evidence-based guidelines for inpatient pediatric eating disorders. The aim was to gain perspectives from those providing and receiving inpatient pediatric eating disorder care on the essential components treatment. Method: A modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-based opinions. Participants (N = 74) were recruited for three panels: clinicians (n = 24), carers (n = 31), and patients (n = 19), who endorsed three rounds of statements online. Results: A total of 167 statements were rated, 79 were accepted and reached a consensus level of at least 75{\%} across all panels, and 87 were rejected. All agreed that families should be involved in treatment, and thatpsychological therapy be offered in specialist inpatient units. Areas of disagreement included that patients expressed a desire for autonomy in sessions being available without carers, and that weight gain should be gradual and admissions longer, in contrast to carers and clinicians. Carers endorsed that legal frameworks should be used to retain patients if required, and that inpatients are supervised at all times, in contrast to patients and clinicians. Clinicians endorsed that food access should be restricted outside meal times, in contrast to patients and carers. Discussion: The findings indicate areas of consensus in admission criteria, and that families should be involved in treatment, family involvement in treatment, while there was disagreement across groups on topics including weight goals and nutrition management. Perspectives from patients, carers, and clinicians may be useful to consider during future revisions of best practice guidelines.",
keywords = "consumers, Delphi method, eating disorders, inpatient treatment, pediatric, qualitative",
author = "Amy O'Brien and Julie McCormack and Hoiles, {Kimberley J.} and Watson, {Hunna J.} and Anderson, {Rebecca A.} and Phillipa Hay and Egan, {Sarah J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eat.22857",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "401--410",
journal = "International Journal of Eating Disorders",
issn = "0276-3478",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "5",

}

O'Brien, A, McCormack, J, Hoiles, KJ, Watson, HJ, Anderson, RA, Hay, P & Egan, SJ 2018, 'Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services' International Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22857

Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services. / O'Brien, Amy; McCormack, Julie; Hoiles, Kimberley J.; Watson, Hunna J.; Anderson, Rebecca A.; Hay, Phillipa; Egan, Sarah J.

In: International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 401-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services

AU - O'Brien, Amy

AU - McCormack, Julie

AU - Hoiles, Kimberley J.

AU - Watson, Hunna J.

AU - Anderson, Rebecca A.

AU - Hay, Phillipa

AU - Egan, Sarah J.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Objective: There are few evidence-based guidelines for inpatient pediatric eating disorders. The aim was to gain perspectives from those providing and receiving inpatient pediatric eating disorder care on the essential components treatment. Method: A modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-based opinions. Participants (N = 74) were recruited for three panels: clinicians (n = 24), carers (n = 31), and patients (n = 19), who endorsed three rounds of statements online. Results: A total of 167 statements were rated, 79 were accepted and reached a consensus level of at least 75% across all panels, and 87 were rejected. All agreed that families should be involved in treatment, and thatpsychological therapy be offered in specialist inpatient units. Areas of disagreement included that patients expressed a desire for autonomy in sessions being available without carers, and that weight gain should be gradual and admissions longer, in contrast to carers and clinicians. Carers endorsed that legal frameworks should be used to retain patients if required, and that inpatients are supervised at all times, in contrast to patients and clinicians. Clinicians endorsed that food access should be restricted outside meal times, in contrast to patients and carers. Discussion: The findings indicate areas of consensus in admission criteria, and that families should be involved in treatment, family involvement in treatment, while there was disagreement across groups on topics including weight goals and nutrition management. Perspectives from patients, carers, and clinicians may be useful to consider during future revisions of best practice guidelines.

AB - Objective: There are few evidence-based guidelines for inpatient pediatric eating disorders. The aim was to gain perspectives from those providing and receiving inpatient pediatric eating disorder care on the essential components treatment. Method: A modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-based opinions. Participants (N = 74) were recruited for three panels: clinicians (n = 24), carers (n = 31), and patients (n = 19), who endorsed three rounds of statements online. Results: A total of 167 statements were rated, 79 were accepted and reached a consensus level of at least 75% across all panels, and 87 were rejected. All agreed that families should be involved in treatment, and thatpsychological therapy be offered in specialist inpatient units. Areas of disagreement included that patients expressed a desire for autonomy in sessions being available without carers, and that weight gain should be gradual and admissions longer, in contrast to carers and clinicians. Carers endorsed that legal frameworks should be used to retain patients if required, and that inpatients are supervised at all times, in contrast to patients and clinicians. Clinicians endorsed that food access should be restricted outside meal times, in contrast to patients and carers. Discussion: The findings indicate areas of consensus in admission criteria, and that families should be involved in treatment, family involvement in treatment, while there was disagreement across groups on topics including weight goals and nutrition management. Perspectives from patients, carers, and clinicians may be useful to consider during future revisions of best practice guidelines.

KW - consumers

KW - Delphi method

KW - eating disorders

KW - inpatient treatment

KW - pediatric

KW - qualitative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043680220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eat.22857

DO - 10.1002/eat.22857

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 401

EP - 410

JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders

JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders

SN - 0276-3478

IS - 5

ER -