Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conifer root discrimination against soil nitrate and the ecology of forest succession

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

THE high incidence of failure when late-successional conifer species are replanted on disturbed forest sites is a considerable problem. Here we advance a hypothesis that might explain many of these reforestation problems on a physiological basis, within the framework of forest succession. It is known that the chemical speciation of inorganic nitrogen in forest soils changes from predominantly ammonium (NH4/+) in late.successional (mature forest) soils to mostly nitrate (NO3) after disturbances such as clearcut harvesting. The capacity of plant roots to take up and use these two sources of nitrogen is therefore very important for species establishment on successionally different sites. We have used kinetic and compartmental- analysis techniques with the radiotracer 13N to compare the efficiency of nitrogen acquisition from NH4/+ and NO3 sources in seedlings of white spruce, an important late-successional conifer. We found that uptake of NH4/+ was up to 20 times greater than that of NO3 from equimolar solution, cytoplasmic concentration of NH4/+ was up to 10 times greater than that of NO3, and physiological processing of NO3 was much less than that of NH4/+. This reduced capacity to use NO3 is thought to present a critical impediment to seedling establishment on disturbed sites, where species better adapted to NO3 would have a significant competitive advantage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-61
Number of pages3
JournalNature
Volume385
Issue number6611
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conifer root discrimination against soil nitrate and the ecology of forest succession'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this