Concern about threatened species and ecosystem disservices underpin public willingness to pay for ecological restoration

Kerrie A. Wilson, Katrina Davis, Virginia Matzek, Marit Kragt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Public preferences for ecological restoration can be revealed through environmental valuation studies that aim to measure willingness to pay. However, respondents' environmental views will often influence the conclusions drawn from such studies. We conducted a national survey of perceptions of the benefits and perverse outcomes arising from ecological restoration using a dichotomous choice payment card. Using interval regression to estimate willingness to pay, we find that there are respondents who will perceive mostly biodiversity benefits from restoration, with a particular interest in threatened species recovery. We find that this eco-centric view of the benefits of restoration also increases the dollar amount that respondents are willing to pay to support restoration activities. A proportion of respondents also perceive restoration as having negative impacts, with concerns orientated towards increased fire, decreased farmland productivity, and groundwater availability. Perceptions of the potential effects of restoration on land productivity had a significant negative influence on the amount of money respondents were willing to pay. These findings are useful for targeting outreach in order to garner public support for ecological restoration. © 2018 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-519
Number of pages7
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online date8 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

ecological restoration
willingness to pay
threatened species
ecosystems
ecosystem
land productivity
outreach
national surveys
ecological value
agricultural land
groundwater
restoration ecology
public
restoration
biodiversity
productivity
valuation
targeting

Cite this

@article{c51294da43054eac8c09a1f98eada581,
title = "Concern about threatened species and ecosystem disservices underpin public willingness to pay for ecological restoration",
abstract = "Public preferences for ecological restoration can be revealed through environmental valuation studies that aim to measure willingness to pay. However, respondents' environmental views will often influence the conclusions drawn from such studies. We conducted a national survey of perceptions of the benefits and perverse outcomes arising from ecological restoration using a dichotomous choice payment card. Using interval regression to estimate willingness to pay, we find that there are respondents who will perceive mostly biodiversity benefits from restoration, with a particular interest in threatened species recovery. We find that this eco-centric view of the benefits of restoration also increases the dollar amount that respondents are willing to pay to support restoration activities. A proportion of respondents also perceive restoration as having negative impacts, with concerns orientated towards increased fire, decreased farmland productivity, and groundwater availability. Perceptions of the potential effects of restoration on land productivity had a significant negative influence on the amount of money respondents were willing to pay. These findings are useful for targeting outreach in order to garner public support for ecological restoration. {\circledC} 2018 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.",
author = "Wilson, {Kerrie A.} and Katrina Davis and Virginia Matzek and Marit Kragt",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/rec.12895",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "513--519",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Concern about threatened species and ecosystem disservices underpin public willingness to pay for ecological restoration. / Wilson, Kerrie A.; Davis, Katrina; Matzek, Virginia; Kragt, Marit.

In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 27, No. 3, 05.2019, p. 513-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concern about threatened species and ecosystem disservices underpin public willingness to pay for ecological restoration

AU - Wilson, Kerrie A.

AU - Davis, Katrina

AU - Matzek, Virginia

AU - Kragt, Marit

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Public preferences for ecological restoration can be revealed through environmental valuation studies that aim to measure willingness to pay. However, respondents' environmental views will often influence the conclusions drawn from such studies. We conducted a national survey of perceptions of the benefits and perverse outcomes arising from ecological restoration using a dichotomous choice payment card. Using interval regression to estimate willingness to pay, we find that there are respondents who will perceive mostly biodiversity benefits from restoration, with a particular interest in threatened species recovery. We find that this eco-centric view of the benefits of restoration also increases the dollar amount that respondents are willing to pay to support restoration activities. A proportion of respondents also perceive restoration as having negative impacts, with concerns orientated towards increased fire, decreased farmland productivity, and groundwater availability. Perceptions of the potential effects of restoration on land productivity had a significant negative influence on the amount of money respondents were willing to pay. These findings are useful for targeting outreach in order to garner public support for ecological restoration. © 2018 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.

AB - Public preferences for ecological restoration can be revealed through environmental valuation studies that aim to measure willingness to pay. However, respondents' environmental views will often influence the conclusions drawn from such studies. We conducted a national survey of perceptions of the benefits and perverse outcomes arising from ecological restoration using a dichotomous choice payment card. Using interval regression to estimate willingness to pay, we find that there are respondents who will perceive mostly biodiversity benefits from restoration, with a particular interest in threatened species recovery. We find that this eco-centric view of the benefits of restoration also increases the dollar amount that respondents are willing to pay to support restoration activities. A proportion of respondents also perceive restoration as having negative impacts, with concerns orientated towards increased fire, decreased farmland productivity, and groundwater availability. Perceptions of the potential effects of restoration on land productivity had a significant negative influence on the amount of money respondents were willing to pay. These findings are useful for targeting outreach in order to garner public support for ecological restoration. © 2018 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.

U2 - 10.1111/rec.12895

DO - 10.1111/rec.12895

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 513

EP - 519

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 3

ER -