Conceptualizing and modeling interpersonal trust in exchange relationships: The effects of incomplete model specification

Graham R. Massey, Paul Z. Wang, Andrew S. Kyngdon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The importance of interpersonal trust in exchange relationships is well-established, and trust is known to have two important and distinct underlying forms, one cognitive, the other affective. Despite this, trust studies often model only the cognitive task-related form and omit the affective form. This article achieves two main objectives. First it demonstrates that interpersonal trust is best considered a bidimensional construct consisting of both cognitive and affective components, and that omitting either form of trust from empirical studies is a conceptual and specification error. Second, we reveal that both forms explain a large amount of variance in the quality of exchange relationships. Also, studies omitting affective trust ignore the more potent of the two trust dimensions. In addition, models examining only one form of trust strongly inflate the apparent effects of that form, and are diagnostically unsound. Our results have important theoretical and managerial implications regarding the conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal trust, and its role in improving the effectiveness of exchange relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-71
Number of pages12
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
Volume76
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Modeling
Exchange relationships
Interpersonal trust
Model specification
Empirical study
Conceptualization
Specification error

Cite this

@article{c412c90ad56848a59c561e5740275899,
title = "Conceptualizing and modeling interpersonal trust in exchange relationships: The effects of incomplete model specification",
abstract = "The importance of interpersonal trust in exchange relationships is well-established, and trust is known to have two important and distinct underlying forms, one cognitive, the other affective. Despite this, trust studies often model only the cognitive task-related form and omit the affective form. This article achieves two main objectives. First it demonstrates that interpersonal trust is best considered a bidimensional construct consisting of both cognitive and affective components, and that omitting either form of trust from empirical studies is a conceptual and specification error. Second, we reveal that both forms explain a large amount of variance in the quality of exchange relationships. Also, studies omitting affective trust ignore the more potent of the two trust dimensions. In addition, models examining only one form of trust strongly inflate the apparent effects of that form, and are diagnostically unsound. Our results have important theoretical and managerial implications regarding the conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal trust, and its role in improving the effectiveness of exchange relationships.",
keywords = "Exchange relationships, Trust, Under- and over-socialization",
author = "Massey, {Graham R.} and Wang, {Paul Z.} and Kyngdon, {Andrew S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.06.012",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "60--71",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Conceptualizing and modeling interpersonal trust in exchange relationships : The effects of incomplete model specification. / Massey, Graham R.; Wang, Paul Z.; Kyngdon, Andrew S.

In: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 76, 01.01.2019, p. 60-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing and modeling interpersonal trust in exchange relationships

T2 - The effects of incomplete model specification

AU - Massey, Graham R.

AU - Wang, Paul Z.

AU - Kyngdon, Andrew S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The importance of interpersonal trust in exchange relationships is well-established, and trust is known to have two important and distinct underlying forms, one cognitive, the other affective. Despite this, trust studies often model only the cognitive task-related form and omit the affective form. This article achieves two main objectives. First it demonstrates that interpersonal trust is best considered a bidimensional construct consisting of both cognitive and affective components, and that omitting either form of trust from empirical studies is a conceptual and specification error. Second, we reveal that both forms explain a large amount of variance in the quality of exchange relationships. Also, studies omitting affective trust ignore the more potent of the two trust dimensions. In addition, models examining only one form of trust strongly inflate the apparent effects of that form, and are diagnostically unsound. Our results have important theoretical and managerial implications regarding the conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal trust, and its role in improving the effectiveness of exchange relationships.

AB - The importance of interpersonal trust in exchange relationships is well-established, and trust is known to have two important and distinct underlying forms, one cognitive, the other affective. Despite this, trust studies often model only the cognitive task-related form and omit the affective form. This article achieves two main objectives. First it demonstrates that interpersonal trust is best considered a bidimensional construct consisting of both cognitive and affective components, and that omitting either form of trust from empirical studies is a conceptual and specification error. Second, we reveal that both forms explain a large amount of variance in the quality of exchange relationships. Also, studies omitting affective trust ignore the more potent of the two trust dimensions. In addition, models examining only one form of trust strongly inflate the apparent effects of that form, and are diagnostically unsound. Our results have important theoretical and managerial implications regarding the conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal trust, and its role in improving the effectiveness of exchange relationships.

KW - Exchange relationships

KW - Trust

KW - Under- and over-socialization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051007465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.06.012

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 60

EP - 71

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

ER -