Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Jay Robert Ebert; Peter Kevin Edwards; J Currie; Brendan Keith Joss; Timothy Robert Ackland; J Buelow; Ben Hewitt

doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350

Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Jay Robert Ebert, Peter Kevin Edwards, J Currie, Brendan Keith Joss, Timothy Robert Ackland, J Buelow, Ben Hewitt

School of Human Sciences

Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common. Insufficient strength and functional symmetry may contribute to re-injury after ACLR, and is commonly evaluated via hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry. More recently, the Back in Action (BIA) protocol was developed to assist the return to sport (RTS) decision making process after ACLR. This study sought to compare limb symmetry indices (LSIs) and RTS pass rates, in commonly employed hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry to components of the BIA battery in ACLR patients.

Original language	English
Pages	77-78
Number of pages	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350
Publication status	Published - Nov 2017
Event	2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference - The Westin Langkawi, Langkawi, Malaysia Duration: 25 Oct 2017 → 28 Oct 2017

Conference

Conference	2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference
Country/Territory	Malaysia
City	Langkawi
Period	25/10/17 → 28/10/17

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350

Cite this

Ebert, J. R., Edwards, P. K., Currie, J., Joss, B. K., Ackland, T. R., Buelow, J., & Hewitt, B. (2017). Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. 77-78. Abstract from 2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference, Langkawi, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350

@conference{a131c94f2722408d8cd3b12025891166,

title = "Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction",

abstract = "Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common. Insufficient strength and functional symmetry may contribute to re-injury after ACLR, and is commonly evaluated via hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry. More recently, the Back in Action (BIA) protocol was developed to assist the return to sport (RTS) decision making process after ACLR. This study sought to compare limb symmetry indices (LSIs) and RTS pass rates, in commonly employed hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry to components of the BIA battery in ACLR patients.",

author = "Ebert, {Jay Robert} and Edwards, {Peter Kevin} and J Currie and Joss, {Brendan Keith} and Ackland, {Timothy Robert} and J Buelow and Ben Hewitt",

year = "2017",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350",

language = "English",

pages = "77--78",

note = "2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference ; Conference date: 25-10-2017 Through 28-10-2017",

}

Ebert, JR, Edwards, PK, Currie, J, Joss, BK , Ackland, TR, Buelow, J & Hewitt, B 2017, 'Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction', 2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference, Langkawi, Malaysia, 25/10/17 - 28/10/17 pp. 77-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350

Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. / Ebert, Jay Robert; Edwards, Peter Kevin; Currie, J et al.
2017. 77-78 Abstract from 2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference, Langkawi, Malaysia.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

AU - Ebert, Jay Robert

AU - Edwards, Peter Kevin

AU - Currie, J

AU - Joss, Brendan Keith

AU - Ackland, Timothy Robert

AU - Buelow, J

AU - Hewitt, Ben

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common. Insufficient strength and functional symmetry may contribute to re-injury after ACLR, and is commonly evaluated via hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry. More recently, the Back in Action (BIA) protocol was developed to assist the return to sport (RTS) decision making process after ACLR. This study sought to compare limb symmetry indices (LSIs) and RTS pass rates, in commonly employed hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry to components of the BIA battery in ACLR patients.

AB - Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common. Insufficient strength and functional symmetry may contribute to re-injury after ACLR, and is commonly evaluated via hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry. More recently, the Back in Action (BIA) protocol was developed to assist the return to sport (RTS) decision making process after ACLR. This study sought to compare limb symmetry indices (LSIs) and RTS pass rates, in commonly employed hop tests and isokinetic dynamometry to components of the BIA battery in ACLR patients.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.350

M3 - Abstract

SP - 77

EP - 78

T2 - 2017 ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference

Y2 - 25 October 2017 through 28 October 2017

ER -

Comparison of the 'Back in Action' test battery to commonly employed hop and strength tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this