Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?

A. Munro; Yee Leung; K. Spilsbury; Colin Stewart; J. Semmens; J. Codde; V. Williams; Peter O'Leary; N. Steel; Paul Cohen

doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.024

Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?

A. Munro, Yee Leung, K. Spilsbury, Colin Stewart, J. Semmens, J. Codde, V. Williams, Peter O'Leary, N. Steel, Paul Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Objective. To compare the outcomes of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) treated with cold knife cone (CKC) biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS). Study design. This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of Western Australian patients with ACIS diagnosed between 2001 and 2012. Outcomes included pathological margin status and the incidence of persistent or recurrent endocervical neoplasia (ACIS and adenocarcinoma) during follow-up (

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	258-263
Journal	Gynecologic Oncology
Volume	137
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.024
Publication status	Published - 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.024

Cite this

Munro, A., Leung, Y., Spilsbury, K., Stewart, C., Semmens, J., Codde, J., Williams, V., O'Leary, P., Steel, N., & Cohen, P. (2015). Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard? Gynecologic Oncology, 137(2), 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.024

@article{e15bbaa9c80a492886477ac26a9d9f8b,

title = "Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?",

abstract = "{\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier Inc. Objective. To compare the outcomes of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) treated with cold knife cone (CKC) biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS). Study design. This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of Western Australian patients with ACIS diagnosed between 2001 and 2012. Outcomes included pathological margin status and the incidence of persistent or recurrent endocervical neoplasia (ACIS and adenocarcinoma) during follow-up (",

author = "A. Munro and Yee Leung and K. Spilsbury and Colin Stewart and J. Semmens and J. Codde and V. Williams and Peter O'Leary and N. Steel and Paul Cohen",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.024",

language = "English",

volume = "137",

pages = "258--263",

journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",

issn = "0090-8258",

publisher = "Academic Press",