Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the detectability of the intra-oral photographic method in comparison to the baseline, comprehensive dental examination (CDE), in children when performed by different levels of dental practitioners. Materials and methods: As part of a quality assurance program, intra-oral photographs were obtained from 77 patients (2–18 years) as part of a CDE before undertaking dental treatment under general anaesthesia. A DSLR camera was utilised to acquire images which were subsequently uploaded to a cloud-based server. The baseline for each participant was established during the CDE, utilising both visual and radiographic examination, which was then compared to the assessment made by a mid-level dental practitioners (MLDP). The evaluation was based on utilising an odontogram where the teeth were charted either as decayed or filled. Results: Specificity (95%) was higher than sensitivity (61.5%) when comparing the photographic assessment with the benchmark CDE assessment. The inter-rater reliability between the two methods of assessment was substantial, with a kappa score of 0.62. The photographic assessment method underestimated the decayed and filled teeth, as observed by the caries experience (dft/DFT scores) (CDE = 7.01 vs. photographic assessment = 5.22). There were lower levels of diagnostic detection in the posterior teeth as compared to the anterior teeth assessments. Conclusions: Although the CDE is still considered to be the gold-standard, this study found that the photographic caries assessment by MLDP produced an acceptable diagnostic level of detection particularly for the anterior teeth. Clinical relevance: The photographic method could offer a potential cost-saving and user-friendly screening. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2383-2387
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Oral Investigations
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date9 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

Gold
Tooth
Benchmarking
General Anesthesia
Germany

Cite this

@article{830405f4f2dd4d9fa50fb95ef2f8873e,
title = "Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the detectability of the intra-oral photographic method in comparison to the baseline, comprehensive dental examination (CDE), in children when performed by different levels of dental practitioners. Materials and methods: As part of a quality assurance program, intra-oral photographs were obtained from 77 patients (2–18 years) as part of a CDE before undertaking dental treatment under general anaesthesia. A DSLR camera was utilised to acquire images which were subsequently uploaded to a cloud-based server. The baseline for each participant was established during the CDE, utilising both visual and radiographic examination, which was then compared to the assessment made by a mid-level dental practitioners (MLDP). The evaluation was based on utilising an odontogram where the teeth were charted either as decayed or filled. Results: Specificity (95{\%}) was higher than sensitivity (61.5{\%}) when comparing the photographic assessment with the benchmark CDE assessment. The inter-rater reliability between the two methods of assessment was substantial, with a kappa score of 0.62. The photographic assessment method underestimated the decayed and filled teeth, as observed by the caries experience (dft/DFT scores) (CDE = 7.01 vs. photographic assessment = 5.22). There were lower levels of diagnostic detection in the posterior teeth as compared to the anterior teeth assessments. Conclusions: Although the CDE is still considered to be the gold-standard, this study found that the photographic caries assessment by MLDP produced an acceptable diagnostic level of detection particularly for the anterior teeth. Clinical relevance: The photographic method could offer a potential cost-saving and user-friendly screening. {\circledC} 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.",
author = "Park, {Joon Soo} and Estie Kruger and Wendy Nicholls and Mohamed Estai and John Winters and Marc Tennant",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-018-2700-y",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "2383--2387",
journal = "Clinical Oral Investigations",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers

AU - Park, Joon Soo

AU - Kruger, Estie

AU - Nicholls, Wendy

AU - Estai, Mohamed

AU - Winters, John

AU - Tennant, Marc

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Objectives: To determine the detectability of the intra-oral photographic method in comparison to the baseline, comprehensive dental examination (CDE), in children when performed by different levels of dental practitioners. Materials and methods: As part of a quality assurance program, intra-oral photographs were obtained from 77 patients (2–18 years) as part of a CDE before undertaking dental treatment under general anaesthesia. A DSLR camera was utilised to acquire images which were subsequently uploaded to a cloud-based server. The baseline for each participant was established during the CDE, utilising both visual and radiographic examination, which was then compared to the assessment made by a mid-level dental practitioners (MLDP). The evaluation was based on utilising an odontogram where the teeth were charted either as decayed or filled. Results: Specificity (95%) was higher than sensitivity (61.5%) when comparing the photographic assessment with the benchmark CDE assessment. The inter-rater reliability between the two methods of assessment was substantial, with a kappa score of 0.62. The photographic assessment method underestimated the decayed and filled teeth, as observed by the caries experience (dft/DFT scores) (CDE = 7.01 vs. photographic assessment = 5.22). There were lower levels of diagnostic detection in the posterior teeth as compared to the anterior teeth assessments. Conclusions: Although the CDE is still considered to be the gold-standard, this study found that the photographic caries assessment by MLDP produced an acceptable diagnostic level of detection particularly for the anterior teeth. Clinical relevance: The photographic method could offer a potential cost-saving and user-friendly screening. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

AB - Objectives: To determine the detectability of the intra-oral photographic method in comparison to the baseline, comprehensive dental examination (CDE), in children when performed by different levels of dental practitioners. Materials and methods: As part of a quality assurance program, intra-oral photographs were obtained from 77 patients (2–18 years) as part of a CDE before undertaking dental treatment under general anaesthesia. A DSLR camera was utilised to acquire images which were subsequently uploaded to a cloud-based server. The baseline for each participant was established during the CDE, utilising both visual and radiographic examination, which was then compared to the assessment made by a mid-level dental practitioners (MLDP). The evaluation was based on utilising an odontogram where the teeth were charted either as decayed or filled. Results: Specificity (95%) was higher than sensitivity (61.5%) when comparing the photographic assessment with the benchmark CDE assessment. The inter-rater reliability between the two methods of assessment was substantial, with a kappa score of 0.62. The photographic assessment method underestimated the decayed and filled teeth, as observed by the caries experience (dft/DFT scores) (CDE = 7.01 vs. photographic assessment = 5.22). There were lower levels of diagnostic detection in the posterior teeth as compared to the anterior teeth assessments. Conclusions: Although the CDE is still considered to be the gold-standard, this study found that the photographic caries assessment by MLDP produced an acceptable diagnostic level of detection particularly for the anterior teeth. Clinical relevance: The photographic method could offer a potential cost-saving and user-friendly screening. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-018-2700-y

DO - 10.1007/s00784-018-2700-y

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 2383

EP - 2387

JO - Clinical Oral Investigations

JF - Clinical Oral Investigations

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 5

ER -