Comparative housing, urban crisis and political economy: an ethnographically based ‘long view’ from Auckland, Singapore and Berlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper follows a call for a ‘long view’ perspective on contemporary housing problems and policy. It applies this longitudinal lens to a multi-city comparative ethnographical study that investigates and relates place-specific and common trajectories and policies in regard to contemporary urban housing. By comparing Auckland, Singapore and Berlin from a heterodox political economy perspective, it demonstrates how contemporary challenges and proposed solutions over housing have deep-seated historical and geographical roots that are usually overlooked. It suggests that comprehending current housing issues as cumulative effects of developments and policy (non)-action taken in the past, and relating and evaluating those constitutive trajectories and transformations across (disparate) cities, current academic and policy debates can be enriched and deepened. One lesson is that ‘learning from the past’ may be a more promising crisis response than nowadays’ politically fetishised learning via global best practice and spatially mobilised policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalHousing Studies
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

urban housing
political economy
Berlin
Singapore
housing
learning
trajectory
best practice
comparative study
policy

Cite this

@article{3960af648a394570be22d256a698f2d6,
title = "Comparative housing, urban crisis and political economy: an ethnographically based ‘long view’ from Auckland, Singapore and Berlin",
abstract = "This paper follows a call for a ‘long view’ perspective on contemporary housing problems and policy. It applies this longitudinal lens to a multi-city comparative ethnographical study that investigates and relates place-specific and common trajectories and policies in regard to contemporary urban housing. By comparing Auckland, Singapore and Berlin from a heterodox political economy perspective, it demonstrates how contemporary challenges and proposed solutions over housing have deep-seated historical and geographical roots that are usually overlooked. It suggests that comprehending current housing issues as cumulative effects of developments and policy (non)-action taken in the past, and relating and evaluating those constitutive trajectories and transformations across (disparate) cities, current academic and policy debates can be enriched and deepened. One lesson is that ‘learning from the past’ may be a more promising crisis response than nowadays’ politically fetishised learning via global best practice and spatially mobilised policy.",
keywords = "Comparative housing, ethnography, historical sensitivity, urban political economy",
author = "Steffen Wetzstein",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/02673037.2018.1487038",
language = "English",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Housing Studies",
issn = "0267-3037",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative housing, urban crisis and political economy

T2 - an ethnographically based ‘long view’ from Auckland, Singapore and Berlin

AU - Wetzstein, Steffen

PY - 2018/7/5

Y1 - 2018/7/5

N2 - This paper follows a call for a ‘long view’ perspective on contemporary housing problems and policy. It applies this longitudinal lens to a multi-city comparative ethnographical study that investigates and relates place-specific and common trajectories and policies in regard to contemporary urban housing. By comparing Auckland, Singapore and Berlin from a heterodox political economy perspective, it demonstrates how contemporary challenges and proposed solutions over housing have deep-seated historical and geographical roots that are usually overlooked. It suggests that comprehending current housing issues as cumulative effects of developments and policy (non)-action taken in the past, and relating and evaluating those constitutive trajectories and transformations across (disparate) cities, current academic and policy debates can be enriched and deepened. One lesson is that ‘learning from the past’ may be a more promising crisis response than nowadays’ politically fetishised learning via global best practice and spatially mobilised policy.

AB - This paper follows a call for a ‘long view’ perspective on contemporary housing problems and policy. It applies this longitudinal lens to a multi-city comparative ethnographical study that investigates and relates place-specific and common trajectories and policies in regard to contemporary urban housing. By comparing Auckland, Singapore and Berlin from a heterodox political economy perspective, it demonstrates how contemporary challenges and proposed solutions over housing have deep-seated historical and geographical roots that are usually overlooked. It suggests that comprehending current housing issues as cumulative effects of developments and policy (non)-action taken in the past, and relating and evaluating those constitutive trajectories and transformations across (disparate) cities, current academic and policy debates can be enriched and deepened. One lesson is that ‘learning from the past’ may be a more promising crisis response than nowadays’ politically fetishised learning via global best practice and spatially mobilised policy.

KW - Comparative housing

KW - ethnography

KW - historical sensitivity

KW - urban political economy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049617820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02673037.2018.1487038

DO - 10.1080/02673037.2018.1487038

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Housing Studies

JF - Housing Studies

SN - 0267-3037

ER -