Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL

Camilla Baasch Andersen

Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL

UWA Law School

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paper › Chapter › peer-review

Original language	English
Title of host publication	An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law
Editors	John Felemegas
Place of Publication	New York, NY
Publisher	Cambridge University Press
Pages	133 - 138
Number of pages	5
ISBN (Print)	0521868726
Publication status	Published - 2007

Cite this

Andersen, C. B. (2007). Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL. In J. Felemegas (Ed.), An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law (pp. 133 - 138). Cambridge University Press.

Andersen, Camilla Baasch. / Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL. An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law. editor / John Felemegas. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 133 - 138

@inbook{af34e041d088434c96a38d014613ed9d,

title = "Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL",

author = "Andersen, {Camilla Baasch}",

year = "2007",

language = "English",

isbn = "0521868726",

pages = "133 -- 138",

editor = "John Felemegas",

booktitle = "An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

Andersen, CB 2007, Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL. in J Felemegas (ed.), An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 133 - 138.

Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL. / Andersen, Camilla Baasch.
An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law. ed. / John Felemegas. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 133 - 138.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paper › Chapter › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL

AU - Andersen, Camilla Baasch

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0521868726

SP - 133

EP - 138

BT - An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law

A2 - Felemegas, John

PB - Cambridge University Press

CY - New York, NY

ER -

Andersen CB. Comparative analysis between the provisions of the CISG regarding notice requirements (Arts. 39 & 26) and the counterpart provisions of the UNIDROIT Principles and the PECL. In Felemegas J, editor, An international approach to the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as uniform sales law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 133 - 138