TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparability of serum prostate-specific antigen measurement between the Roche Diagnostics Elecsys 2010 and Abbott Architect i2000
AU - Gray, M.A.
AU - Cooke, R.R.
AU - Weinstein, Philip
AU - Nacey, J.N.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Background Most prostate cancers are characterized by a significant rise in the production of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which is used widely in screening for prostate cancer. Within New Zealand, PSA is measured on automated immunoassay analysers, including models by Abbott Laboratories (Architect 2000) and Roche Diagnostics (Elecsys 2010). These assays produce similar, but not identical, results.Objective To compare the measurement of PSA between the Elecsys 2010 and the Architect i2000 assay.Methods We measured PSA concentrations in each of 194 serum samples using both the Roche Elecsys 2010 and the Abbott Architect i2000 and compared the results using various statistical methods.Results PSA concentrations measured on the Architect i2000 system were less than those on the Elecsys 2010 system, by an average of 11%.Conclusion Because the results from the two assays are different, reference intervals appropriate to the method of PSA measurement should be used.
AB - Background Most prostate cancers are characterized by a significant rise in the production of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which is used widely in screening for prostate cancer. Within New Zealand, PSA is measured on automated immunoassay analysers, including models by Abbott Laboratories (Architect 2000) and Roche Diagnostics (Elecsys 2010). These assays produce similar, but not identical, results.Objective To compare the measurement of PSA between the Elecsys 2010 and the Architect i2000 assay.Methods We measured PSA concentrations in each of 194 serum samples using both the Roche Elecsys 2010 and the Abbott Architect i2000 and compared the results using various statistical methods.Results PSA concentrations measured on the Architect i2000 system were less than those on the Elecsys 2010 system, by an average of 11%.Conclusion Because the results from the two assays are different, reference intervals appropriate to the method of PSA measurement should be used.
U2 - 10.1258/000456304323019578
DO - 10.1258/000456304323019578
M3 - Article
C2 - 15117434
SN - 0004-5632
VL - 41
SP - 207
EP - 212
JO - Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
JF - Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
IS - 3
ER -