TY - JOUR
T1 - Community partner viewpoints on forest partnership
T2 - why does it matter?
AU - Rachmawan, Dicky
AU - Acciaioli, Gregory
AU - Djafar, TB Massa
AU - Hidayat, Herman
AU - Siburian, Robert
AU - Ekawati, Sulistya
AU - Nurhidayah, Laely
AU - Sundary, Letsu Vella
AU - Utomo, Marcellinus Mandira Budi
AU - Ratri, Annisa Meutia
AU - Suryani, Dini
N1 - Funding Information:
shows a significant change in interests, particularly those of INLB in accepting the community version of the tourism plan in Tepian Buah. This plan is supported by the Berau Regency Government and approved by MoEF. Slightly different from INLB, the interest in SMR4 complements that of the community in Punan Mahkam Village. The two groups consistently support the social forestry partnership progress as their contributions are FMU and FORCLIME. In addition, there is the Segah Pencita Alam Community, which unintendedly supports the Tepian Buah Community through a viral phenomenon in social media.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Many studies that have focused on forestry partnerships have failed to examine their substantial impact on social and ecological outcomes from the perspective of community partners in Indonesia. Using Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance Regimes (IFCGs) and qualitative methods, this study, therefore, explores community partners’ views on the quality of their collaboration in the country. The findings indicate that the viewpoints of community partners play a vital role in forestry partnership scheme, influencing substantially the quality of their collaboration. In addition, it has been observed that the viral phenomenon on social media in Indonesia has become a critical catalyst for changes in political dynamics and power relations among collaborating groups that are not well defined in the IFCG framework. The results also suggest highlighting the vital role of collaborative actions, which is even more crucial than acquiring a legal licence.
AB - Many studies that have focused on forestry partnerships have failed to examine their substantial impact on social and ecological outcomes from the perspective of community partners in Indonesia. Using Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance Regimes (IFCGs) and qualitative methods, this study, therefore, explores community partners’ views on the quality of their collaboration in the country. The findings indicate that the viewpoints of community partners play a vital role in forestry partnership scheme, influencing substantially the quality of their collaboration. In addition, it has been observed that the viral phenomenon on social media in Indonesia has become a critical catalyst for changes in political dynamics and power relations among collaborating groups that are not well defined in the IFCG framework. The results also suggest highlighting the vital role of collaborative actions, which is even more crucial than acquiring a legal licence.
KW - collaborative governance regimes
KW - community partners
KW - forestry partnership
KW - Indonesia
KW - Word
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85185693382
U2 - 10.1080/23251042.2024.2316993
DO - 10.1080/23251042.2024.2316993
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85185693382
VL - 10
SP - 206
EP - 221
JO - Environmental Sociology
JF - Environmental Sociology
IS - 2
ER -
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions