Community-based pulmonary rehabilitation in a non-healthcare facility is feasible and effective

Nola Cecins, Holly Landers, Sue Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRPs) are most commonly provided in hospital settings which present barriers to attendance such as long distances or travel times. Community-based settings have been used in an attempt to alleviate the travel burden. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of a network of community-based PRPs provided in non-healthcare facilities (CPRPs). The CPRPs were established in five venues and comprised two supervised group sessions each week for 8 weeks. Participant inclusion criteria and guidelines for exercise testing and training were developed to reduce the risk of adverse events. Outcome measures included 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and health-related quality of life (chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ)). Respiratory-related hospital admission data were collected in the 12 months prior to and following the program. Two hundred and fifty-one participants (79% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mean +/- SD FEV1 49 +/- 21%predicted) entered a CPRP of which 166 (66%) completed. Improvements were demonstrated in 6MWD (mean difference (95% CI) 44 m (37-52)) and total CRQ score (0.5 points per item (0.4-0.7)). Fewer participants had a respiratory-related hospital admission following the program (12% vs. 37%, p <0.0001). Pulmonary rehabilitation is safe, feasible and effective when conducted in community-based non-healthcare facilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-10
Number of pages8
JournalChronic Respiratory Disease
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Community-based pulmonary rehabilitation in a non-healthcare facility is feasible and effective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this