Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions.

Graeme Hankey

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41
JournalACP Journal Club
Volume142
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Cite this

Hankey, Graeme. / Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions. In: ACP Journal Club. 2005 ; Vol. 142, No. 2. pp. 41.
@article{ed9a7faa84a5425db69337ddcc469993,
title = "Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions.",
author = "Graeme Hankey",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "41",
journal = "ACP Journal Club",
issn = "1056-8751",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "2",

}

Hankey, G 2005, 'Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions.' ACP Journal Club, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 41.

Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions. / Hankey, Graeme.

In: ACP Journal Club, Vol. 142, No. 2, 2005, p. 41.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions.

AU - Hankey, Graeme

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

M3 - Letter

VL - 142

SP - 41

JO - ACP Journal Club

JF - ACP Journal Club

SN - 1056-8751

IS - 2

ER -

Hankey G. Commentary - Stenting was non inferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions. ACP Journal Club. 2005;142(2):41.