TY - JOUR
T1 - Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atheromthrombotic Events
AU - Bhatt, D.L.
AU - Fox, K.A.A.
AU - Hacke, W.
AU - Berger, P.B.
AU - Black, H.R.
AU - Boden, W.E.
AU - Cacoub, P.
AU - Cohen, E.A.
AU - Creager, M.A.
AU - Easton, J.D.
AU - Flather, M.D.
AU - Haffner, S.M.
AU - Hamm, C.W.
AU - Hankey, Graeme
AU - Johnston, C.
AU - Mak, K-H.
AU - Mas, J-L.
AU - Montalescot, G.
AU - Pearson, T.A.
AU - Steg, P.G.
AU - Steinhubl, S.R.
AU - Weber, M.A.
AU - Brennan, D.M.
AU - Fabry-Ribaudo, L.
AU - Booth, J.
AU - Topol, E.J.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - BACKGROUND:Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus low-dose aspirin has not been studied in a broad population of patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events.METHODS:We randomly assigned 15,603 patients with either clinically evident cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors to receive clopidogrel (75 mg per day) plus low-dose aspirin (75 to 162 mg per day) or placebo plus low-dose aspirin and followed them for a median of 28 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes.RESULTS:The rate of the primary efficacy end point was 6.8 percent with clopidogrel plus aspirin and 7.3 percent with placebo plus aspirin (relative risk, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.05; P=0.22). The respective rate of the principal secondary efficacy end point, which included hospitalizations for ischemic events, was 16.7 percent and 17.9 percent (relative risk, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.995; P=0.04), and the rate of severe bleeding was 1.7 percent and 1.3 percent (relative risk, 1.25; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.61 percent; P=0.09). The rate of the primary end point among patients with multiple risk factors was 6.6 percent with clopidogrel and 5.5 percent with placebo (relative risk, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.59; P=0.20) and the rate of death from cardiovascular causes also was higher with clopidogrel (3.9 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P=0.01). In the subgroup with clinically evident atherothrombosis, the rate was 6.9 percent with clopidogrel and 7.9 percent with placebo (relative risk, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.998; P=0.046).CONCLUSIONS:In this trial, there was a suggestion of benefit with clopidogrel treatment in patients with symptomatic atherothrombosis and a suggestion of harm in patients with multiple risk factors. Overall, clopidogrel plus aspirin was not significantly more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the rate of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes.
AB - BACKGROUND:Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus low-dose aspirin has not been studied in a broad population of patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events.METHODS:We randomly assigned 15,603 patients with either clinically evident cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors to receive clopidogrel (75 mg per day) plus low-dose aspirin (75 to 162 mg per day) or placebo plus low-dose aspirin and followed them for a median of 28 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes.RESULTS:The rate of the primary efficacy end point was 6.8 percent with clopidogrel plus aspirin and 7.3 percent with placebo plus aspirin (relative risk, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.05; P=0.22). The respective rate of the principal secondary efficacy end point, which included hospitalizations for ischemic events, was 16.7 percent and 17.9 percent (relative risk, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.995; P=0.04), and the rate of severe bleeding was 1.7 percent and 1.3 percent (relative risk, 1.25; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.61 percent; P=0.09). The rate of the primary end point among patients with multiple risk factors was 6.6 percent with clopidogrel and 5.5 percent with placebo (relative risk, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.59; P=0.20) and the rate of death from cardiovascular causes also was higher with clopidogrel (3.9 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P=0.01). In the subgroup with clinically evident atherothrombosis, the rate was 6.9 percent with clopidogrel and 7.9 percent with placebo (relative risk, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.998; P=0.046).CONCLUSIONS:In this trial, there was a suggestion of benefit with clopidogrel treatment in patients with symptomatic atherothrombosis and a suggestion of harm in patients with multiple risk factors. Overall, clopidogrel plus aspirin was not significantly more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the rate of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Aspirin/adverse effects
KW - Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy
KW - Data Interpretation, Statistical
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Drug Therapy, Combination
KW - Female
KW - Hemorrhage/chemically induced
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology
KW - Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects
KW - Proportional Hazards Models
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Stroke/epidemiology
KW - Thrombosis/prevention & control
KW - Ticlopidine/adverse effects
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa060989
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa060989
M3 - Article
C2 - 16531616
VL - 354
SP - 1706
EP - 1717
JO - The New England Journal of Medicine
JF - The New England Journal of Medicine
SN - 0028-4793
IS - 16
ER -