Clinicopathological and immunohistological features of polypoid endometriosis

Colin Stewart, Chrianna Bharat

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Web of Science)


    © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Aims: To compare clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of polypoid endometriosis (PE) and non-polypoid endometriosis (NPE). Methods and results: Fifteen cases of PE and 20 cases of NPE were assessed. All cases were stained immunohistochemically for CD10 and p16 and the proportion of p16-positive stromal and epithelial cells was estimated. On review, 10 PE cases resembled NPE histologically but occurred at mucosal or serosal surfaces, or within cyst cavities, that permitted polyp formation. These cases had a similar age distribution and immunohistochemical profile to NPE. The remaining five PE cases showed histological similarity to eutopic endometrial polyps; these occurred in older patients, and showed significantly greater stromal and epithelial p16 immunoreactivity. Conclusions: There are two main subgroups of PE. The majority of cases in this series showed similar histological features to NPE, but involved anatomical sites that facilitated exophytic or polypoid growth. The remaining PE cases resembled eutopic endometrial polyps histologically and immunophenotypically and they occurred in older patients. These findings suggest that such lesions are 'true' polyps sharing a pathogenetic relationship with similar lesions arising in the endometrium.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)398-404
    Number of pages7
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicopathological and immunohistological features of polypoid endometriosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this